0
How did the supreme court decision in the New York times c v Sullivan of the press?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
It set actual malice standard. Meaning that the plaintiff (famous person/officer/etc...) had to prove that what was published was actual written with disregard to the truth and false information was purposely put there.
In this case, Sullivan had to prove what New York Times co had written was blahbity blah blah, plug in the details.
Do your homework jeez. I'm only a sevie and I know this.. ._.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
The Supreme Court decision in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan established the actual malice standard for defamation cases involving public officials. This standard requires public officials to prove that false statements were made with knowledge of their falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth in order to successfully sue for libel. This decision significantly expanded protection for freedom of the press under the First Amendment.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoThe New York Times company versus Sullivan case in 1964, held that the actual malice intent has to be made before a public official can sue for libel and defamation. The case was brought because of an effort in the south to prevent newspapers from reporting on their activities so they could continue to support segregation. The ruling in favor of the New York Times, allowed news agencies all over the world to report on the Civil Rights Movement.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agogovernment related
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoSwagg
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the Supreme Court decision in New York Co v Sullivan affect freedom of the press?
It made the news more reliable. Now, a publisher can not knowingly put out false information.
How did the supreme court decision in New York times Co. v. Sullivan affect freedom of the press?
It made the news more reliable. Now, a publisher can not knowingly put out false information.
How did the supreme court decision in New York times co. V Sullivan affect freedom of the press?
It made the news more reliable. Now, a publisher can not knowingly put out false information.
How did the supreme court decision in New York Time Co. v. Sullivan affect freedom of the press?
It made the news more reliable. Now, a publisher can not knowingly put out false information.
Does the courts decision prohibit all censorship or prior restraint of the press?
The Supreme Court's position on prior restraint of the press is that it is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court went on to say it's a very serious issue and a total infringement of the rights of the press under the First Amendment.
How has the supreme court generally respond to press confidentiality issues?
The Supreme Court generally responds to press confidentiality issues by deferring or deflecting them. In most cases, the Supreme Court does not want to respond to issues of press confidentiality.
How did the Supreme Court decision in New York Times Co v Sullivan affect freedom of the press?
The Supreme Court decision in New York Times Co v Sullivan strengthened freedom of the press by setting higher standards for public figures to prove defamation. It established the "actual malice" standard, requiring proof that a statement was made with knowledge of its falsity or reckless disregard for the truth for defamation claims involving public officials. This decision allowed the press more freedom to report on public officials without fear of crippling lawsuits.
What has the author Harold W Sullivan written?
Harold W. Sullivan has written: 'Contempts by publication' -- subject(s): Contempt of court, Freedom of the press, Libel and slander
What landmark civil rights case did the supreme court decide in 1954?
In Brown v. Board of Education (Topeka, Kansas), the Supreme Court found unconstitutional the establishment of segregated schools to which children were assigned based on race. This presaged the end of the "separate but equal" policy and encouraged blacks in the US to press for the provision of equal status for all US citizens.
Does the Court's decision prohibit all censorship or prior restraint of the press?
Cause the court sucks and this question has no answer anywhere you go on the internet!
Does the court decision prohibit all censorship or prior restraint of the press?
Cause the court sucks and this question has no answer anywhere you go on the internet!
Why is Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier important to the school press?
This was a 1988 Supreme Court case that held that student newpapers produced within the curriculum of a school (such as a journalism or writing class that is sponsored by the school) were not entitled to the same level of First Amendment protection as those of more general circulation. The United States Supreme Court decision reversed that of a lower court which had limited the school's right of control over the content of the school-sponsored paper. The citation for the Supreme Court decision is 484 U.S. 260.
