The previously decided cases are called precedents. The US Supreme Court "opinion of the Court" (the official decision in a case) sets a binding precedent, meaning all other courts are supposed to adhere to the Supreme Court's legal or constitutional interpretation (are "bound" by the decision) when deciding future cases.
Using a previous court decision to support your case is called citing precedent.
The doctrine encouraging the use of precedents is stare decisis (Latin: let the decision stand).
Decided case are called "precedents" and they are used to decide present and future cases that are very similar to all the prior decided cases. They are basically guidelines to future cases.
if it sounds the same or the same rule applys
Added: It is known as following precedent.
High court finds hundreds of labor cases were improperly decided
Custody cases are cases that are not decided upon by a jury. Traffic court cases are also not cases decided upon by a jury.
"Disposed cases" generally means cases which have been decided.
who decides whether or not the supreme court will review a case
Is it ever possible for cases involving the same issue to be decided differently in different costs of a court system
civil law
The supreme Court was overwhelmed by cases.
Easy cases are adjudicated by lower courts. Harder cases are decided by the higher courts.
Civil cases can be "settled" out of court, if the parties are able to reach an agreement. Criminal cases may be plea-bargained if the defendant agrees to the conditions offered by the prosecuting attorney.
It's decided by location. The court in Chicago hears cases for northern Illinois, the court in Los Angeles hears cases for central Califirnia, etc.
Most "criminal court cases" are decided by the accused. It is you who has control over your destiny. 90% of criminal defendants plea out!
They are called "precedents of law" and affect how similar present or future cases are decided.