File a motion to re-open the case with the court that granted the order.
Techically he can't get a restraining order against the boyfriend because it would probably be against the law.
Yes, it is POSSIBLE, but he would have to have sufficient grounds to convince the judge that a restraining order was justified.
No because they have records and they don't want people who have a bad record.
Yes it actually does. I had an abusive ex and he went to my college so when i put out the restraining order the Board of the school suspended him because he Did some of it on campus. But it really has to be on campus to get suspension.
"Judgment-proof" means that even if a plaintiff obtains its civil judgment against its defendant, the defendant has no assets from on which the court can levy in proceedings in aid of execution to satisfy the judgment. It also generally implies that as a result the defendant is not worth being sued, because the possibility of ultimately recovering a money judgment is nil.Added: There is no such legal principle as judgment proof. It is not a defense to a lawsuit. One can obtain a judgment against a defendant, regardless of the ability to collect the judgment. Plaintiffs often choose to proceed against defendants who appear to be judgment proof because they believe that the defendant will eventually have assets or income against which to collect.You are correct. The status of being judgment-proof is as a matter of fact and not a matter of law. Which is why I used the word "implied" and not the word "holds". Therefore, it is legal to the extent that as a matter of fact the judgment cannot be satisfied.
If you have a permenant restraining no contact order then your ex-husband commenting on your facebook picture definitely violates the terms of the restraining order because he is not suppose to contact you at all and commenting on your facebook picture would be a form of contact.
some serious stuff man i wouldn't go there i wouldn't even talk about there bye If the restraining order is still in place if he violates the restraining order he can be punished to the full extent of the law(i.e. jail time, fine, probation, etc.)
you shouldn't have a restraining order on her boyfriend unless she is 13 and under because she will probably do things behind your back but yeah that's about it.... don't be the worst dad/mom on the block...
yes but someone would need to move for a restraining order to work in this situation because when someone has a restraining order against them then they have to stay away from that person a certain distance
the jugdement would efect the bonding because the wouldn't like each other
No personal property of an indivual officer of a corporation may be seized to pay a corporate debt. This is so even if that individual is the person responsible for the claim against the corporation. As long as the judgment is against the corporation, only corporate assests may be seized. Sometimes plaintiffs in actions against corporations try to get judgments against the individual officers or shareholders as well as the corporation itself by means of a legal theory called "piercing the corporate veil". This is usually not successful. But even if the plaintiff were successful and got a judgment against the corporation and the individual, the individual's property would not be subject to seizure because of the judgment against the corporation. His/her property would be subject to seizure because there would be a judgment against him/her personally. This is the whole purpose of the corporate structure to begin with, that is, the ability to run a business without fear of personal liablity.
no because you cannot clear your CRB check but it depends what restraining order it is