There is one linear inequality in 2 variables: l and x. That is not enough to obtain a solution.
I think you would use an average two step equation to solve. Graph on a number line. If it was -2, go over 2 to the left, and make a dot. It is hollow or solid. It is solid if there is a line beneath the less than or greater than sign indicating that it is equal to....
It's just like solving algebra: [(J/4)-8] < (4) (J/4) < (12) (J) < (12*3) J < 48 The inequality is true when J is less than 48.
21? 84 over 4 is 21, so j=21... or is it a different statement? i did it as an equation; you might mean an inequality, as it says, but you don't say whether it is greater than or less than another value.
It is not possible to answer the question. An equation or inequality can be solved. However, the question contains no equation nor inequality but only an expression.
s=35 or less
There are an infinite number of points that qualify. Please tell us what our choices are, and we'll select the right one[s].
It is a process by which expenditure - including allowances for unforseen situations - is made to be less than, or equal to, the expected income. This inequality need not be satisfied in each time period but must be satisfied over the time period in question.
11 to solve this, simply divide 33 by 3.
Less than.
No; they are equal.
no it is equal
Less than: x<y Greater than: x>y Equal to: x=y There is also less than or equal to, which is the less than symbol with a line over it, as well as greater than or equal to, which is the greater than symbol with a line over it. Not equal to is an equal sign with a slash. About equal to is an equal sign but with squiggly lines intead of straight.