Although there is some disagreement about the precise rules for a valid syllogism --particularly about the "existential" requirement -- there is general agreement on some tests. To test the validity of an enthymeme, fill in the missing premise, then examine the premises and the conclusion. Max Black (Critical Thinking) listed eight rules for a valid syllogism. Irving Copi (Introduction to Logic) reduced them to six:
1. It must have three, and only three, unambiguous categorical terms.
2. The middle term must be distributed at least once.
3. If either the major or the minor term is distributed in the premises, it must be distributed in the conclusion.
4. Two negative premises yield no valid conclusion.
5. If one of the premises is negative, then the conclusion must be negative.
6. Two particular premises yield no valid conclusion.
The word "hypothesis" has this as one of its definitions.
The abstract noun forms of the adjective valid are validness and validity.
Content(Logical/Rational)-content contains a representative and appropriate sample of the subject matterCriterion(Predictive)- score on a test predicts understanding or performance in some other areaConstruct-test mesures the concept or variable, at which it is aimed
In general terms, "validity" denotes "something acceptable within context". Thus, in an ordinary, everyday context, an example of "validity" would be a statement made which turns out to be true. Here, one would say that the statement made has "validity". By contrast, in a legal context, a statement made by a witness in a court case might be considered to lack "validity" because of certain legal strictures that prevent the witness' perspective from being considered by a jury. Many other examples could be provided, given the many different applications of "validity" that are possible.
The word proves in this context means "tests the validity of." The expression is generally misunderstood to mean that the exception somehow demonstrates the validity of the rule.
Validity of a test refers to the ability of test to test what it is supposed to test
Validity of a test refers to the ability of test to test what it is supposed to test
To ensure that a periodic test is valid you must observe and analyze the test data. This method of test validity is called content validity.
To ensure that a periodic test is valid you must observe and analyze the test data. This method of test validity is called content validity.
To ensure that a periodic test is valid you must observe and analyze the test data. This method of test validity is called content validity.
others type of validity of a test other than content
others type of validity of a test other than content
others type of validity of a test other than content
others type of validity of a test other than content
others type of validity of a test other than content
To ensure the content validity of a test, you need to ensure that you are covering all of the factors that the test seeks to analyze. If your test does not factor in the importance of a particular facet of the issue, your test will lack content validity.
The prosecuting attorney questioned the validity of the defendant's story. Administer the test according to rules in the manual or the validity of the test will be compromised.