Such is possible because the election is not by direct popular vote but rather by electors that are chosen state by state on a winner take all basis. Therefore the losing candidate can win some states by a huge majority and pile up huge numbers of popular votes whereas the winning candidates wins a majority of states by slim margins.
yes
a runoff primary is held
a runoff primary is held
a runoff primary is held
In order to obtain a primary nomination in Texas, a candidate must receive a majority of the popular vote, which is defined as more than 50% of the total votes cast. If no candidate receives a majority, a runoff election is held between the top two candidates.
George Bush?
bob
A majority or plurality of votes.
A majority or plurality of votes.
This is true. On three occasions in US history, the new president did not receive a majority of the popular votes, namely John Q. Adams, Hayes and George W. Bush in 2000.
It is possible that a candidate could win the "national" popular vote total but lose the electoral vote total. However, the electoral vote of every state accurately reflects the popular vote within that state. A candidate could win the electoral votes in a large state such as California winning the state by a huge margin. However, the opposing candidate could win the electoral votes in other states because a majority of the voters in those states vote for the opposing candidate.
This is often the case when a popular president is nominated for a second term. If there is no candidate to receive the majority of votes, The chairperson calls for a second ballot. This happens when there is more than one popular candidate.