The president is actually electors by electors chosen from each state and not by popular vote. Most states award their electors in a winner-take-all basis; the leading vote-getter in the state gets all the electoral votes . Therefore a candidate can win by huge majorities in the states he wins and lose by narrow margins in the states he loses and so pile up a majority of popular votes.
This possibility is part of the election process set by the main part of the US Constitution and is not due to any amendment.
they can lose the electoral college vote if the representatives and senators in the electoral college feel that the candidate should not win their state over in the election.
this is true:)
Yes. It's happened before.
It is possible that a candidate could win the "national" popular vote total but lose the electoral vote total. However, the electoral vote of every state accurately reflects the popular vote within that state. A candidate could win the electoral votes in a large state such as California winning the state by a huge margin. However the opposing candidate could win the electoral votes in other states because a majority of the voters in those states vote for the opposing candidate.
Yes, and it has happened before.
The candidate can lose the popular vote but still win the election because the Electoral College really elects the President. The popular vote is really only to elect the electors. A candidate could win the popular vote by winning with huge margins in a few state and losing by narrow margins in eleven large states and end up with a losing electoral total. This actually happened in 1876,1884 and 2000. In 1824, Andrew Jackson led in both popular vote and electoral vote but lost because he did not win a majority of the electoral vote.
False!!!!Per the US Constitution, the Electoral College actually is the body that elects the President. There have been some elections in the past where the popular vote was won by a candidate, but the Electoral College elected another candidate.
The total popular vote can be won by a presidential candidate who loses the election because of the electoral college. Each state is allowed a certain number of votes in the electoral college based upon its population. Therefore, states with larger populations carry more weight than less populous states.
In the US presidential election of 2008, the Republican candidate was Senator John McCain. He was and still is one of the two senators from Arizona.
The spoiler is a political candidate (sometimes of a third party) who has little to no chance of winning an election but can still decide the fate of an election by taking votes away from other candidates.
The politician who becomes president is not the one with the most votes nationwide, but the one with the most "electoral votes." The country is divided up into about 538 sections. Each section has a winning presidential candidate, and the person who wins the most regions becomes president. If there is a close election and a candidate wins by a lot of votes in the riding's they win, but loses by a very small number of votes in the riding's they lose, then they can finish with over 50% of the vote but not win. It's happened a couple times in American history, and is an "indirect election" compared to a "direct election," which would occur if the popular vote elected the president.
Six. That sounds like Republican Herbert Hoover lost big time, but he still got 39.6% of the popular vote against Franklin D. Roosevelt's 57.4%.
the electoral college is most likely the most unique. As it is possible to lose the popular vote for President but still win the election by the electoral college.
Three presidents have lost the popular vote and still won the election: Rutherford B. Hayes (1876); Benjamin Harrison (1888); George W. Bush (2000).
Yes- it is still legally possible for someone new to jump into the race. It is too late to get on the ballot in some of the primaries, but if no candidate nails down the nomination in the primaries, the nominee could be decided at the convention and delegates are free to vote for anybody after the first ballot.
The Democratic Candidate was William Jennings Bryan, running against Republican William McKinley. The Populist Party also nominated Bryan but McKinley still won.
The U. S. Constitution doesn't say anything about popular votes in presidential elections. Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 leaves the method for choosing electors totally up to each state. Rules pertaining to the electoral college are in Article II Section 1 Clause 2 and in the 12th and 14th Amendments.