Exposure of a population to a toxin that kills a high percentage of the population selectively eliminates those individuals most susceptible to the toxin. This leaves the most resistant individuals to reproduce individuals that are also resistant. After many generations of this selection the whole population is resistant.
When a population of bacteria is bombarded with antibiotics, the 'weak' ones will die. The ones with some resistance built in will survive, and divide to form a new population of copies of themselves, or a resistant population. This in itself is survival of the fittest in a very pure form. The 'selection' of stronger individuals that survive to breed is natural selection.
If we didn't use an antibiotic (methacillin), we would not have selected for those bacteria that had a resistance gene. Now we have to contend with that MRSA (methacillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus). By using the methacillin, we are producing a selecting environment.
Say a population of bacteria is treated with a antibiotic. Most of the bacteria die, but a few survive. The have been natural selected because their traits that lead to their survival are passed on to the next generation of bacteria which now have these traits of survivability and reproductive success. Natural selection leading to evolution.
Normally there are many kinds of bacteria on your body, called your natural flora. If a bacterium is producing extra enzymes to counter antibiotics then is tends to grow more slowly because it's using energy to produce these substances. This usually means that this bacterium will be selected against since other, less resistant bacteria can grow faster and out-compete it. However, if the bacteria are in an environment that is exposed to antibiotics, then the resistant strain is selected for. The non-resistant bacteria will all be killed off, leaving the antibiotic-resistant bacteria to thrive and grow exponentially. They are able to monopolize the area because they can survive and there is no competition to keep their numbers down. This shows selective pressures against the non-resistant bacteria and for the resistance.
In some cases (such as MRSA) one kind of bacteria has multiple genes against many different kinds of antibiotics. The overuse of different antibiotics has favored their survival. This makes them very difficult to destroy and very serious if an infection occurs.
his development in science is that he created the natural selection
Adaptation does not allow for natural selection: natural selection causes adaptation.
Genetic variation in itself does not 'support' natural selection: it is what natural selection acts upon.
The development of a new species through evolution is called speciation.
They are the selective agent in natural selection ;)
Natural selection is the mechanism primarily responsible for the development of today's biodiversity.
Bacteria is the answer
The process of natural selection results in populations of bacteria that are not harmed by antibiotics because bacteria that are born with mutations that make them immune to antibiotics will be the ones to survive and reproduce.
Natural development and selection.
natural selection
well you see the evolution by natural selection of Mycobacterium teberculosis bacteria in their new environment is described best with one word... semen
Natural selection
It is an example of natural selection.
No, all life evolves. Bacteria evolve, viruses evolve, protists evolve, plants evolve, fungi evolve and animals evolve. Evolution is driven by Natural Selection. So, no. The evolution of all life on Earth is driven by Natural Selection: all bacteria, plants, animals, mammals, fish, insects, biochemical pathways, behaviours et cetera evolve by Natural Selection.
Natural Selection
his development in science is that he created the natural selection
-natural selection -restriction enzymes -lysogeny