Want this question answered?
The Assyrian army was much better than the Babylonian Army, because they had a tactical offensive very well planned.
Kushite and Egyptian soldiers could not compete with the large Assyrian army.
To fight and win battles.
because they did
I think the Assyrian army would have lost if they fought because they would just have there hands to fight with.
I think the Assyrian army would have lost if they fought because they would just have there hands to fight with.
Yes They Were
Yes
in history, the deadliest army is the assyrian army and now i believe it is the usa
Assyrian was a big kingdom that was independent. Chaldean was a small nation that did not have their independence.
both were empires
There isn't. The Assyrian army had words for "city units", "cavalry units" and such, but unlike the later Roman army's Centuriae, they had no standarized units with a fixed number of soldiers with a name to describe them.