By the offense that is committed - where it was committed - what specific applicable law is violated, usually determines who has "jurisdiction."
By the offense that is committed - where it was committed - what specific applicable law was violated, usually determines who has "jurisdiction."
It means to delay making a decision on a matter- leaving it on the table, rather than acting on it.
The legal system will decide. It is not a decision for the public.
Declaring war is a national decision rather than a state. Both will weigh in on the issue considerably but the federal government will have the ultimate say.
Assuming the matter before the Arkansas trial court involves federal or constitutional law (rather than a state statute) and is analogous to a decision of the US Supreme Court, they are supposed to abide by Supreme Court decisions under the doctrine of stare decisis.If they fail to adhere to established interpretations of law, they are handing the defendant or respondent valid grounds for appealing his or her case.Yes.
That is a decision made for commercial reasons by the company, it is not a matter for WikiAnswers.
No. Or at least, not as badly as they are currently doing. If regulation is to be done, it should be done at the school district level rather than as a matter of federal law.
federal judges
It doesn't matter what the student would rather be doing.
i would rather die by droning in the ocean rather than die due to a disease
The federal reserve is a private organization. Its members are appointed.
We do not yet know what "matter" is and what "alive" means, so answering such a questions is rather difficult.