345 years
345 years
[object Object]
the answer
345 years
dfgghhhhgvgfrxrxrxrxr4x4xx/juhju78uuhhhy6uuhgttyuuhgyy7. u u u yvy yv6v55ct t t. ccttttcyv6b7b7b8bub8b7b6gftrr44rrrt77u vy g vggff5f5cvggyuivjfucjfjfjfkfig
50
200
This question is a bit difficult to understand. I will presume that you mean how The Romans settled in Rome. The Romans did not settle In Rome. They already lived there before the foundation of Rome was said to have occurred in 753 BC. Rome was said to have been founded by Romulus. He unified the independent settlements on what were to become the Seven Hills of Rome (the Capitoline, Palatine, Caelian, Esquiline, Viminal, Quirinal and Aventine hills) under a single state ruled by him and became the first king of Rome. This Rome was the results of the coming together of several already existing settlements in this hilly area. There is archaeological evidence that settlements already existed in area of the valley between the Aventine, Palatine and Capitoline hills and by the river Tiber in the 14th-13th century BC. Other finds are remains in the area of the Forum dating to the 11th century BC and remains of an acropolis on the Palatine Hill dating to the 10th century BC.
The Romans did not first settle on the Palatine Hill. The foundation of Rome does not refer to the building of a new city by settlers. it refers to the foundation of Rome as a city state. It involved the unification of separate settlements on what were to become the Seven Hills of Rome (the Palatine, Capitoline, Quirinal, Viminal Esquiline, Caelian and Aventine) into a single state under the rule of a king. Romulus was said to have founded Rome on the Palatine Hill. He then extended hi rule to the other hills. The foundation was said to have involved the fusions of Latins and some Sabines who lived on two of the hills. The Sabines fought against Romulus, but then agreed to join Romulus' new city state. Their king, Titus Tatius, became joint king until his death five years later.
The foundation of Rome was said to have involved a fusion between Latins and Sabines. The foundation of the city involved the unification of separate settlements on what were to become the Seven Hills of Rome. Five of these hills were inhabited by Latins, and two were inhabited by Sabines.
TheLatins(the Romans were Latins), like all early Italic peoples, adopted and adapted the westernGreekalphabetto develop their written languages. Greek settlers established colonies (settlements)in southern Italy between the 8th and the 6th centuries BC. Being amoreadvanced civilisation, they had an impact on the peoples they came into contact with in Italy. Thisincludedthe adoption of their alphabet for writing.
Yes. The Romans were Latins. The foundation of Rome did not involve the foundation of a new city. It was the foundation of the Roman city-state. Romulus, the founder of Rome and its first king, united the separate settlements on what were to become the Seven Hills of Rome into a united state under his rule. The foundation of Rome also involved a fusion between the Latins and some Sabines who settled on two of the seven hills who then became latinised.
The Romans were Latins.
The Romans were Latins.
The Romans were Latins.
The Romans were (and still are) Latins.
The Etruscna were not relevant to the founding of Rome. Rome was founded by Romulus by uniting the peoples on the settlements on hills which became the famous Seven Hills of Rome into a unified state under his Rule. Romulus was also the first king of Rome. The foundation of Rome was said to have involved a fusion between the Latins who lived in the septimontium (seven spurs on three of the seven hills (the Palatine, the Esquiline and the Caelian) and Sabines who settled on two hills (the Quirinal and the Viminal)
Palatine
The first city of the Latins were Rome.