It depends on the size of the Nuclear device, anywhere from 5 square miles and up
They do not have to be, but launching an ICBM that could only destroy a single city block with a conventional warhead would generally be considered a waste of the expensive missile that launched it.
North Korea would first launch a Nuclear Missile at South Korea, due to there past arguments. This would prompt the U.S to launch a missile, causing a nuclear war between communists and democracies.
america
I think its MOAB(Mother Of All Bombs)........ The most destructive missile would be the peace maker missile carried 12 nuclear warheads.
A nuclear war, which would result in a nuclear winter and the end of most if not all of life on Earth.
You likely mean to limitation and disarmament of nuclear weapons. This would be the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
Agni-5 7500km & with nuclear warhead it would be 5500 km
One
with a nuclear weapon they vary from short and long distances it depends what they equip the missile with like external boosters if everything is added which could make it fly further it would reach almost 7 000 miles ish give or take a few hundred
The Cuban missile crisis.After Fidel Castro led a successful revolt to sieze power in Cuba in 1959 he was courted and mentored buy the Soviet Union, who then secretly installed armed rocket silo's in Cuba Pointed at the USA from less than 100 miles away. It did not take the US, under J F Kennedy, to the discover them. The Soviets were told to remove them or else. The world waited with bated breath. Then the Soviets removed them.
Yes, a fusion bomb (hydrogen bomb) would destroy New York City.
No cause a nuclear imbalence would destroy thousands of miles and kill people and makes babies that r born all werid and screwed up and it will give people cancer and make animals and plants mutate and a economic imbalence would take a few years to fix a nuclear one would take thousands