Unfortunately that is very uncertain. Fallout from US Nevada tests alone reached everyone of the "lower 48" states and parts of Canada and Mexico. Statistics on actual radiation levels deposited are spotty. Also how do you count properly deaths caused decades later by latent injury, stillbirths, and birth defects that are eventually fatal. Fallout from the US big pacific tests and USSR big Siberian and arctic tests distributed itself around the globe multiple times. No statistics were even collected on these tests.
In other words, we just don't know.
Impossible to get an accurate answer as deaths were mostly delayed effects that took 10 to 40 years to manifest symptoms. Also no dosimetry was done except on site (and even that was spotty) so exposures were unknown.
One person known to have died due to nuclear testing was John Wayne, his movie "The Conqueror" was shot shortly after one of the Nevada series in a known contaminated zone outside the test range then RKO pictures has several tons of contaminated dirt trucked from the site to use in sound stages for reshooting selected scenes. Of course his heavy smoking contributed too.
Except for a criticality accident in early 1946 before the Crossroads Pacific series, there were no immediate deaths in the US testing program. Other programs may have had different results.
The first or the two nuclear bombs dropped in World War Two, killed 90,000-166,000 people in Hiroshima.
over 200,000 people
Over 200,000 people.
New Mexico (1945)
To be able to monitor unconditionally all nuclear tests. If nuclear tests are allowed freely, no third party would have rights to observe and provide expertise, no error reporting available, no standard recollection of facts, no responsibility recorded.Read more: Why_is_the_nuclear_test_ban_treaty_important
The United Kingdom is a signatory to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty with their last test in 1991 For note, the final European nuclear test was by the French in 1996.
Einsteinium was identified for the first time in nuclear tests debris from Eniwetak by Albert Ghiorso and co-workers in 1952; after this isotopes of Es were prepared in laboratory.
No Americans have died in space. All the deaths during spaceflight have been during launch (7) , during re-entry (7), or on pre-launch tests (3).
Depends what topic. I see you have put this question under the nuclear category so I take it that it's nuclear power your doing? Well you could do radiation tests. Get different substances with volumes of radiation and put a Geiger Counter in them. You could then go on to explain how the Geiger Counter works and what substances contain different volumes of radiation.
No, radiation from these sources is negligible. Most comes from natural background, which depends a lot on the geology of the area. Radon is usually the biggest factor (see the link below)
It is improbable that underground nuclear tests can alter the axial tilt of the earth.
Yes. There have been several tests establishing this beyond a doubt, including the actual detonation of nuclear devices. It's currently prohibited by international treaties, though, since the tests produced new radiation belts and resulted in damage to the electronics of several satellites that passed through the belts. The radiation belts also produced bright auroral displays in both the north and south (until the belts finally disbursed). At least one manned US spaceflight had to be delayed following one of these tests for fear the capsule would pass through the radiation belt and result in overexposure to the astronauts.
None.
The first test at Pokhran was in 1974, there were more tests in 1998
Nevada.
The camera is at a calculated safe distance, the camera is shock mounted in plastic foam, the camera is shielded from direct radiation, the camera photographs an indirect image via a mirror.
no, urine tests look for liver metabolites of THC. radiation is not used.
There were no nuclear tests in Mississippi.
Usually in remote isolated areas.
it was first noticed with the nuclear bomb tests.