There is no minimum number of trees that must be present for an expanse of land to be called a forest - in fact, the name was originally applied to any area used for hunting and had nothing to do with trees.
Thousands of trees O.K!
depends. The minimum there can be is like about 100. Example in Madagascar theres about 50,000 trees. In Brazil in like the whole country theres like 25,000,000 rain forest trees
A "forest of trees" is a large number of trees.An "orchard of trees" is a large number of fruit trees.
forest habitat is usually dominated by the presence of large number of trees and plants
the niche is in the forest up in the trees. the niche is in the forest up in the trees. the niche is in the forest up in the trees. the niche is in the forest up in the trees. the niche is in the forest up in the trees.
It would become a forest.
Fruit trees bear fruit while forest trees can or cant they just have to be in a forest. So fruit trees is a much narrower thing then forest trees.
a group of trees is called a forest of trees
In the simplest sense, to make sure that the number of trees removed are compensated for by the number of trees replanted, so the forest is "self-sustaining" - so it will continually produce wood over many years.
a forest is a compact of many trees where in different animals live. The forest need trees so the animals can live there. The forest needs that many trees.
You can find a forest with no trees in a tundra.
oak trees , red wood trees , and forest wood trees
Yes, the noun forest is a collective noun; a forest of trees. Other collective nouns for trees are a stand of trees, a copse of trees, or a grove of trees.