answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

become simultaneously kings of England and France

User Avatar

Jamir Kovacek

Lvl 13
1y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

become simultaneously kings of England and France

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How might Europe's history have been different if England had won the Hundred Years' War?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How might Europe's history have been different if England had won hundred years' war?

become simultaneously kings of England and France


How might Europe's history been different if England had won the Hundred Years War?

become simultaneously kings of England and France


What is Europes history?

There have been thousands of years of European history, so it would be impossible to answer this question.


How might Eu ropes history have been different if England had won the hundred years war?

The king of England would also rule France. The England /French territory would conquer many more territories possibly, but the French probably would rebel against the king of England.


How has the diversity competition among Europes many ethnic groups affected the history?

to be a strong place and skill ful


History of trains?

The history of trains dates back more than two hundred years ago. The very first steam train rolled over the railways of industrial England in the early 1800s.


How does the King of Brobdingnag's view English history of the preceding hundred year?

The King of Brobdingnag views English history of the preceding hundred years as a series of wars, revolutions, and power struggles that have resulted in much destruction and suffering. He criticizes England's leaders for their greed and corruption, as well as their willingness to sacrifice the well-being of their subjects for personal gain. Ultimately, he sees England as a morally bankrupt society in need of reform.


What has the author James Welwood written?

James Welwood has written: 'An answer to the late K. James's last declaration' -- subject(s): History 'Memoirs of the most material transactions in England, for the last hundred years, preceding the Revolution in 1688' -- subject(s): History 'An answer to the late King James's Declaration to all his pretended subjects in the kingdom of England' -- subject(s): History 'Memoirs of the Most Material Transactions in England: For the Last Hundred ..' 'Memoirs of the most material transactions in England' -- subject(s): History 'An answer to the late King James's Declaration to all his pretended subjects in the kingdom of England, dated at Dublin-Castle, May 8, 1689 ..' -- subject(s): History, Pamphlets, Politics and government


When do you use history or histories?

History is the singular, histories is the plural. A lot of people mistakenly use the singular when it should be the plural, however. Let me give you an example: England has a strong naval history. - England is singular, therefore 'history' is used. England and France have strong naval histories. - Two separate histories belonging to two different countries, so the plural is used. One patient's medical history, but two patients' medical histories.


What is the history of England's economy?

== ==


What was hundred days final defeat?

History of France


History of the hundred island?

daan-daang isla