0
Why might a writer hint at the truth of a story opposed to what an unreliable narrator says?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Answer this ques . Have the narrator slip and reveal an unexpected fact.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoHave the narrator slip and reveal an unexpected fact.
Let another character suggest the truth.
A writer might hint at the truth of a story to create suspense or tension, to engage the reader in piecing together the narrative, or to challenge the credibility of the unreliable narrator. By providing subtle clues to the real story, the writer can deepen the narrative complexity and encourage readers to question the narrator's perspective.
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoThe writer wants you to realize that the narrator is unreliable, and to take everything they've said with a grain of salt.
Kelsie Roach
to help the reader make better sense of the storys main events.
Augustine Lumumba
Let another character suggest the truth
Anonymous
To clarify events and help the reader understand the story better
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why might a writer hint at the truth of a story as opposed to what an unreliable narrator says?
To clarify events and help the reader understand the story betterTo help the reader make better sense of the story's main events
Why might a writer use a naive narrator?
A writer might use a naive narrator to provide a fresh perspective on events, to create dramatic irony by having the reader know more than the narrator, or to evoke sympathy from the reader due to the narrator's innocence and lack of understanding.
Which is a way to tell if a narrator is reliable?
Reliable narrator is the standard form of narration in most stories. A narrator is the voice who is telling a story. That voice can be reliable or unreliable, in that it can be considered to always be telling the story accurately or not. Unreliable narration is really a special, rare case where the narrators credibility has been compromised. To understand reliable narration it is easiest to consider unreliable narration. A narrator might be considered unreliable if their telling of the story is shown likely be inaccurate. The narrator may give conflicting accounts of events (e.g. "Hero"), be revealed to be lying (e.g. "The Usual Suspects"), or it may become apparent that the narrator though believing their account might be suffering from a mental disorder (e.g. "Memento"). In all these situations the narrative is taking place from the first person perspective. Note that in the above examples (I used films, but it applies to everything) the narrator is deceiving the audience i.e. if the audience takes what the narrator says at face value then they have an inaccurate account of what took place. This is different from the narrator being either mistaken, or themselves deceived by another character, in which case they are not being unreliable.
Which of these is the best reason why an author would use an unreliable narrator?
to make a story more interesting (apex)
How is a first person narrator limited in a story?
The narrator might be mistaken or biased about the elements of the story.
The narrator's description of the Pardoner could justly be described as judgmental and biased What might you conclude from this?
The narrator's bias and judgment towards the Pardoner suggest a negative opinion of the character, potentially undermining the Pardoner's credibility or likability. This biased description could serve to shape the reader's interpretation of the Pardoner's actions, motives, and moral character throughout the text.
Which might help a writer hint at the truth of a story told by an unreliable narrator?
To provide the reader with a way to understnad the story better.
Why might Frontinus' and Juvenal's evidence on aqueducts be unreliable?
The evidence might be unreliable because technology and other knowledge has advanced since that time, and their evidence might have been biased.
You might add an extra layer of meaning and depth to your story by conceiving of the narrator as a what?
You could consider the narrator as a unreliable character in the story, creating a sense of mystery and ambiguity for the readers. This approach allows for a deeper exploration of the themes and motives within the narrative, keeping the audience engaged and guessing about the true intentions of the narrator.
Stereotype that might be used about a teenager?
Lazy, unreliable, hoodlums.
What is the limitization of a first person narrator?
The limitations of a first person narrator include limited perspective, bias or unreliable narration, and constraints in presenting events outside of the narrator's direct experience. Additionally, the narrator's personal opinions and emotions can influence the way the story is portrayed to the reader.
What are the dis advantages of using old computers?
slow, might be unreliable
