0
Without more of a description; 10-100 USD or so
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the value of a JL Galef and son 12 Gauge Side by side shotgun that was made in Spain?
I have a Single barrel Galef Made in Italy. Galef is the Opels of guns. The 2 barrel helps but dont expect half of what the Cadilac and Porsche of guns.
What is the origin of 12 gauge double barrel shot gun with the name Monte Carlo?
Trade name used by J.L. Galef and Son, Incorporated, New York City
When was David Galef born?
David Galef was born in 1959.
When was Sandy Galef born?
Sandy Galef was born in 1940.
What has the author David Galef written?
David Galef has written: 'A man of ideas and other stories' 'Flesh' -- subject(s): Fiction, College teachers, Overweight women 'Flaws'
Value for a Galef 22 Cylinder Rifle?
Doubtfull if it will go beyond 100
What is a jl galef ny sole distributor usa1923 model worth?
This type of revolver is a smith and wesson copy made in spain sometime between the 1920's and 1950's. They are usually very reliable and great guns but some were made poorly and can self destuct pretty much immediately. The 1923 comes in a .32 which is worth about 50~100 or the. .38 which is about 100~150
Can you find info on revolver 1923 model 32 cal.?
I have a couple revolvers with "1923 model" on the top of the barrel. My revolvers were made in Spain and imported by J. E. Galef & Sons, a New York based company that was a big firearms importer in its day. Galef, I believe contracted with a number of small manufacturers in Spain to produce revolvers for import. My revolvers have the initials JEG in an oval on the right side but are not marked for the individual factory that made them. My guns take .32 Winchester (aka .32-20) which would have been a fairly hot round back in the 1920s (.32-20 was developed as a round for lever action long guns, so basically the model 1923 guns were revolvers firing a rifle round). These revolvers are copies of Smith & Wesson revolvers of the period (Spain had an interesting approach to protecting patents at the time) so they are a sound design. Many collectors these days say that Spanish guns were of mixed quality and, as a result have little interest in them. My own guns are very solidly made and work reliably, but you should have your gun looked at by a gunsmith before firing it. You won't find .32-20 ammunition at a local gun shop, and it was deemed obsolete for a number of years. But it is now a popular round in "Cowboy Shooting" events and readily available in a low pressure/reduced velocity version (<1,000 fps) from the various websites that sell supplies for cowboy shooting events. Have fun!
Did the monkey banana and water spray experiment ever take place?
The Monkey Banana and Water Spray Experiment The experiment is not real. A vaguely similar experiment by Stephenson (1966) is often quoted as if it supports the story, but it does not. The results of that real experiment do not in any way support the "herd mentality" moral of the story; in some cases, they actively contradicts it. This is how it is commonly told: "The Experiment- Part 1 5 monkeys are locked in a cage, a banana was hung from the ceiling and a ladder was placed right underneath it. As predicted, immediately, one of the monkeys would race towards the ladder, to grab the banana. However, as soon as he would start to climb, the researcher would spray the monkey with ice-cold water. but here's the kicker- In addition, he would also spray the other four monkeys. When a second monkey tried to climb the ladder, the researcher would, again, spray the monkey with ice-cold water, As well as the other four watching monkeys; This was repeated again and again until they learned their lesson Climbing equals scary cold water for EVERYONE so No One Climbs the ladder. The Experiment- Part 2 Once the 5 monkeys knew the drill, the researcher replaced one of the monkeys with a new inexperienced one. As predicted, the new monkey spots the banana, and goes for the ladder. BUT, the other four monkeys, knowing the drill, jumped on the new monkey and beat him up. The beat up new guy thus Learns- NO going for the ladder and No Banana Period- without even knowing why! and also without ever being sprayed with water! These actions get repeated with 3 more times, with a new monkey each time and ASTONISHINGLY each new monkey- who had never received the cold-water Spray himself (and didn't even know anything about it), would Join the beating up of the New guy. This is a classic example of Mob Mentality- bystanders and outsiders uninvolved with the fight- join in 'just because'. When the researcher replaced a third monkey, the same thing happened; likewise for the fourth until, eventually, all the monkeys had been replaced and none of the original ones are left in the cage (that had been sprayed by water). The Experiment- Part 3 Again, a new monkey was introduced into the cage. It ran toward the ladder only to get beaten up by the others. The monkey turns with a curious face asking "why do you beat me up when I try to get the banana?" The other four monkeys stopped and looked at each other puzzled (None of them had been sprayed and so they really had no clue why the new guy can't get the banana) but it didn't matter, it was too late, the rules had been set. And So, although they didn't know WHY, they beat up the monkey just because " that's the way we do things around here" There is no evidence that that this experiment ever took place. An experiment was done in 1966 that involved pairs of monkeys but the results are irrelevant to the above story. Some of the results actually contradict the story: in some pairs, the new monkey behaved so fearlessly around the object that the first monkey learned to lose their fear of it altogether. Sources: Stephenson, G. R. (1967). Cultural acquisition of a specific learned response among rhesus monkeys. In: Starek, D., Schneider, R., and Kuhn, H. J. (eds.), Progress in Primatology, Stuttgart: Fischer, pp. 279-288. Mentioned in: Galef, B. G., Jr. (1976). Social Transmission of Acquired Behavior: A Discussion of Tradition and Social Learning in Vertebrates. In: Rosenblatt, J.S., Hinde, R.A., Shaw, E. and Beer, C. (eds.), Advances in the study of behavior, Vol. 6, New York: Academic Press, pp. 87-88:
