Most people would say that Leonardo da vinci looked at machines way different from others. Only because it took him so long to either draw a picture of Mona Lisa that most machines reminded him of drawings. Many people question whether or not he was a artist or if the way he looks at things are from the perspective of drawings.
In the book 1434 he describes that many of the inventions attributed to Leonardo were found in Chinese books given to the Venetians and studied, redrawn, and improved by him and others. If his theory is true and as a studier of Leo and also of Chinese history he makes a good case), then Leo may not have been so great an inventor as much as a student and adapter. There is no doubt when you look at the pictures by him and his contemporaries, that his drawings bring the machines to life and in a way that makes them look wholly European, but Menzies shows the Chinese illustrations that preceded them.
He was special in his own way, he was the first man who had many different thoughts on inventions in the Renaissance.
There were few machines around until Leonardo had invented them.
He always looked at machines , for the future.
buttfur poopalay jackwagon
because he is is so dumb
gjvuybft
being gay
because he is is so dumb
No, not at all.
Leonardo da Vinci and Raphael.
All artists study (or are at least familiar with) the works of Leonardo. Some may study him more in depth than others but, it can be said that because Leonardo has had such a great impact in the world of western art that he has influenced all western artists to a certain degree. Albeit, some more than others.
Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Raphael, and Titian
because he is is so dumb
because he is is so dumb
Most of our artists are skilled craftsmen.
No, not at all.
Your happy dad.
Monalisa
No, he was not.
One middle age artist was Leonardo Davinci. -
Most artists have. It is good training.
leonardo da vinci
Michaelangelo, Donatello, Raphael and Leonardo
Leonardo Da Vinci, Michelangelo, Raphael da Urbino.