A person accused of witch-hunting would typically defend themselves by presenting evidence that disproves the accusations against them. They may also argue that the allegations are baseless, politically motivated, or driven by personal vendettas. They might seek witnesses, testimonials, or any other form of evidence that supports their innocence and undermines the credibility of the accusations.
By passing all of the "witch tests".
Type your answer here... they just knew they was not a witch the end.
the person who accused a people
There wasn't a way because there was a test. They threw you in a river and if you floated you were a witch and if you drowned you werent a witch. so either way you died xx
Joan was never accused as being a witch but as a heretic.
Mary Phips, the wife of the governor.
Tituba was the person that was the slave of the Parris family. She lived in Salem, Massachusetts and was accused of witchcraft.
They would submerge them in water and if they drowned they were not a witch, but if they survived they were said to be a witch so they would then burn them. Also if you accused a person of being a witch, that was often good enough evidence that they were.
Tituba.
Danforth is a judge in the novel The Crucible, which depicts the Salem witch trials. He says that the difference between witchcraft and ordinary crime is that a person accused of witchcraft cannot defend themselves by calling witnesses.
they thing that some people are around the fire it is a witch
Countless people.
fire water stoning