Asked in Adolf Hitler
Adolf Hitler

How would it be different if their was another Hitler in 2009?

123

Answer

User Avatar
Wiki User
12/20/2010

Would it be different ? There are still dictators and demagogues inflicting human rights abuses on their citizens, in the developed world even the old adage "Might is right" still holds and it seems that conflicts are getting worse and increasing not reducing, I think the conditions for another Hitler type person to emerge are ripe. Look at the way George Bush was able to defy public and world opinion 5 years ago and invade Iraq, for the Iraqi people that has turned into a nightmare scenario. George Bush though not quite Hitler surely should be a better type of leader coming from the USA and a developed country.

look at this guys answer up top and respond to me about its legitimacy as an answer...

Yes it would be because our population of the world is high, the weaponry a lot more developed.

.The same techniques and style Hitler used is being done in North Korea especially. A personality cult, concentration camps to set fear, and a belief that they are superior to others by a far margin to the point where everyone should be united under their rule and belief.

Hitler like the Kim dictator ship would set an ultimate race and bully their way to power and land.

Hitler was a single ruler/demagogue without checks and balances of power.

Iran is ran differently then Hitlers country, they set in fear differently.

With more ways to set in fear, less ways to rebel, it would be clear that a major power would have to set in right away, unlike in World War II when the progression of war was not as fast as it could possibly be today.

Thus concluding it would be 10 times deadlier/dangerous and require more urgency to halt unlike Hitlers panzer division. Try Iran's Nuclear facility behind anti aircraft missile.

"Look at the way George Bush was able to defy public and world opinion 5 years ago and invade Iraq, for the Iraqi people that has turned into a nightmare scenario. "

Hitler invaded Poland, ask yourself why. . .

Kim Ill Sung invaded South Korea. . . ask yourself why...

Now....

Harry s. Truman sent troops to North Korea on facts that an invasion from the North was imminent.

George W. Bush sent troops to Iraq on the pretense they had weapons of mass destruction.

Was China a factor then in the Korean War Yes.

Is Iran, Iraq and the whole middle east a factor now...... ASK YOURSELF BEFORE YOU POST SUCH IGNITE STUFF... IF IRAQ HAD SADDAM WOULD WE BE BETTER OFF TODAY (BECAUSE 10-100 years from now We would have to send them anyways!!!!) but I guess if Hitler was better off with Poland you justify it the same way...wouldn't you.