Goggle your engine, make etc. with the word interferance and I found the sight for it.
No a rotary engine, no pistons.
Get the used engine! The engine is an "interferance type", damage to valve train when the belt brakes.
YES - according to Gates ( they manufacture timing belts etc. ) the 2.3 L four cylinder engine used in the 1997 Ford Ranger IS A NON INTERFERANCE ENGINE
Yes , the 2.2 L - 4 cylinder engine in a 1991 Honda Accord is an interferance engine ( according to www . gates . com - no spaces - they manufacture timing belts etc. )
No it is not an interference engine.
NO. Gates belts has a list. This engine is not interference.
The service manual engine oil capacity for the Leganza 2.2 is 4 liters. I believe it's also in the owners manual.
Yep non interference. I know cause I am majic and I just know my stuff
The camshaft position sensor is located in the engine compartment of the 2002 Daewoo Leganza. It is at the end of the camshaft housing.
yes it is a free-wheeling engine.
No - it is not an interference engine.
On a Neon engine if the timing belt breaks the valves can bend.
andything from1.0 - 2.00ltr Leganza normally 1.6 - 1.8 - 2.0 the daewoo leganza sx has a 2.2ltr
it could ruin your engine, to were it is unfix-able :(
The 1993 Saturn 1.9 is not an interferance engine, and has a chain, not a belt.
the 2.4 l motor is an interference motor
It is not an interference engine, in spite of what some say.
No , the 2.3 liter 4 cylinder engine in a 1997 Ford Ranger is not an interference engine
NO! The 1999 Ford Escort 2.0 liter is not an Interferance engine. Replace the belt at 120,000 miles.NO! The 1999 Ford Escort 2.0 liter is not an Interferance engine. Replace the belt at 120,000 miles.
Yes , Gates ( they make timing belts etc. ) shows it as an interference engine
is the 2000 grand am sedan 2.4 twin cam an interferance motor