The Federalists were the ones whom wanted to aprove the constitution, and make it legal. The Antifederalists were the one whom voted againt aproving the constituition. The Federalists were the ones whom wanted to aprove the constitution, and make it legal. The Antifederalists were the one whom voted againt aproving the constituition.
antifederalists
They didn't want a powerful executive to become a king or tyrant.
Antifederalists opposed the ratification of the Constitution, because, as their name suggests, they distrusted a strong federal government such as the one the Constitution would create. Many antifederalists felt that a strong central government, rather than one granting autonomy and power to the states, would lose sight of the people's desires as the British government lost sight of the colonies' desires.
The federalists got a strong government by passing a Constitution that contained one. The Bill of Rights were a result of continuing discussion with antifederalists.
That constitution still exists. It is the one we use today.
One was the Connecticut Constitution. I am not sure about the other. Good Luck :)
John Locke, mostly. He stole the ideas from a lot of other philosophers but he is the one credited with the influence for the Constitution.
Indian Constitution is one of the lengthiest. It is influenced from the constitutions of USA, UK, France, and others. It is a flexible but at the same time rigid Constitution. No big party or organization has ever questioned its legitimacy.
The antifederalists opposed to Constitution, as they felt it jeopardized their individual rights and state supremacy.Federalists v. Anti-Federalists. Ratification & Anti-Federalist Opposition. John Jay (New York) --- these 3 wrote The Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist opposition to the Constitution is one of the least understood events in American history.
One reason the Antifederalists opposed the new constitution was that they were against any centralized American government forming in the first place. Any indication that this was moving forward was an affront to their ideals.
a fair and speedy trial.