Only fully awakened beings who have left their bodies behind will no longer experience suffering. Even the Buddha said, I spit on old age. He did not say he suffered after his full awakening, but he had to deal, as we all do, with the demands, conditions and limitations of a body.
Everyone experiences suffering, it is the normal status for all life. To a Buddhist the awareness of suffering is the start of the quest to end suffering.
Do not confuse suffering with physical pain - a Buddhist suffering because he wants to own more, is angry, or lustful can attempt to stop it by following the Eightfold Path. A Buddhist suffering because he has fallen off a ladder or burned his hand will seek to end it by visiting a hospital for medical attention.
== == Life is suffering.
The root of suffering is desire.
There is an end to suffering.
The end to suffering is the eightfold path.
That's the Four Noble Truths.
Answer: The Dalai Lama, a well known Buddhist who has put his thoughts to writing, has explained this by saying that pain and suffering result from an unskillful approach to life. The positive aspect to this is that suffering is, by his explanation,: * not the result of being bad * not an unavoidable part of human existence * a condition we can avoid by taking thought and learning a set of skills ( the Eightfold Path) * not the result of the interaction with a deity or the supernatual
An aware person learns from his suffering. The person then avoids this source (lust, anger, greed) to make his life better
They would try to explain it like they don't care like saying life is a suffering the root of suffering isa desire thereis a end to suffering
He will most likely say, "Suffering is a part of life, and I will need to throw away all my desires so I can reach nirvana [a state of peace with no suffering]."
Buddhists generally do not "explain" anything. They would however recall the observation made first of the Noble Truths. The first noble truth is the truth of dukkha. which can be translated as "suffering", but which suggests a basic unsatisfactoriness common to all sentient beings. Buddhists hold this to be the core of the unenlightened life. It reflects the fact that we are impermanent and exist in a constantly changing world. Basically it is a sense that things could be better, no matter how good they are or that any goodness will be short lived.
Yes, by saying this you are saying that and i can explain it but you are saying this -Martin Cole-
Yes, it does.
Just by saying it and be friendly o her/him.
Girls baceball
"Explain this" is actually "You explain this" or some form of that phrase. As such, "You" is the [understood] subject and "explain" is action requested, i.e. the verb. Or another way of saying it is "explain" IS the verb, "explanation" is the noun, as in "You please explain the written explanation to me.' or simply "Explain it to me Lucy".
You can not know for sure that you know something unless you experience it and the question refers to how, when and why you experienced it.
Saying it's worse than terrible and say its like Hitler
Its like saying you take nothing away from a number.
Correct.
Translation: Por favor, expliqueme lo que digo en español. (Literally: Please explain to me what I'm saying in Spanish)
another word of saying that is:i am trying to explicate something to you