0
If all Woolies are Tollies and all Tollies are Wamples then all Wamples are definitely Woolies?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
I think this is True, because wamples are tollies, and tollies are woolies, so all in all wamples do have to definitely be woolies Another view: It's false. If you solve it by replacing known names that make sense, such as "If all [from Hollywood] are [from Los Angeles] and all [from Los Angeles] are [Californians] then all [Californians] are definitely [from Hollywood], you can see that it ISN'T true.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
If all woolies are tollies and all tollies are wamples then a wamples are definitely a woolies?
Absolutely
If all Woolies are Tollies and all Tollies are Wamples then are all Wamples definitely Woolies?
Logically yes
If all Woolies are Tollies and all Tollies are Wamples then all Wamples are definitely Woolies True or False?
False. All Woolies might be tollies but that doesn't mean that all tollies are necessarily woolies. Nor are all wamples necessarily tollies. So the answer is definitely false.
Looking at a standard wall-clock at the time 630 Woolies are Tollies and all Tollies are Wamples then all Wamples are definitely Woolies?
Obviously NO!
If all woolies are tollies are wamples then all wamples are defiently woolies is this true or false?
TRUE
If all Woolies are Tollies and all Tollies are Wamples then can we say all Wamples are definitely Woolies?
No. Although the statements W ---> T, T ---> A (Woolies, Tollies and wAmples) by transitivity lead to the statement W ---> A, the statement A ---> W cannot be derived from this, because of the rules of logic, without further information on the population of Wamples. What this means is that even though all Woolies are Wamples, not all Wamples may be Woolies and we cannot define either way without more information . If this further information was found and showed that all wamples are indeed woolies, then we could write both statements of A ---> W and W A.
If all woolies are tollies and all tollies are wamples than all wamples are definitely tollies?
No. Just because all humans have two legs that doesn't mean that anything with two legs is human..... but that's the equivalent of your your second and third statements. We can ignore the first statement as woolies are only mentioned in it, and not in any other statement.
Of all woolies are tollies are wamples then all wamples are defintley wollies?
No, not necessarily. We can simplify it by saying all tollies are wamples. But the converse of that statement is not necessarily true. You can't say for sure that all wamples are tollies. It makes more sense to look at is with something we know. We can say all poodles are dogs and all dogs are mammals. That doesn't make all mammals poodles.
Are all wamples woolies?
no
If all Plags are Plogs and all Plogs are Tregs then all Plags are definitely Tregs?
The answer is True. Of course All plags are definitely Tregs!!!!
Does all and off rhyme?
Definitely not.
Are all snakes brown?
definitely not!
