if the president lost popular vote and got fewer electoral votes, he/she isn't the president... so that doesnt make sense. but yea, they wouldn't be elected cause they lost both popular and electoral. that's the question right? cause if you mean he lost popular vote but won electoral votes, he would become the president
Electors are elected by popular vote but the president is elected by the electoral college. A president candidate can win the popular vote and still not win if he doesn't win the electoral college.
Chester Arthur was 51 when he was elected vice-president. He was never elected President but was still 51 when became president.
A Presidential candidate can lose the overall popular vote and still become President because the US President is NOT elected by the popular vote. The votes cast by the Electoral College elect the President. This type of thing has happened several times before; this is one reason why Grover Cleveland served two non-consecutive terms.
The president elect is someone who has been elected president but who has not yet been sworn in, or officially taken office. It is still occupied by the current outgoing president. The President still has the job of being president until the president-elect has been sworn in.
Yes he can still be a governor, however, if he is elected as President then he or she must give up the office.
yes you can!
A person might serve for any number of terms as vice president and still be elected to two terms as president.
There have been none. Part of the election law is that an individual must be born in the United States to be elected president.
No. The popular vote for each state determines the ELECTORAL COLLEGE votes, which add up to declare the winner. In this way, if a candidate wins the top states, but not the popular vote, he/she will still become president.
Pratibha Patil, who was elected in 2007 and is still president now.
Eisenhower was elected in 1952 and took office in 1953. He was still president in 1954 and was re-elected in 1956 and so served until January, 20, 1961.
That is a subjective question. The constitution calls for the democratic election of representives, but senators were supposed to be by appointment and the president is still elected by the electors (who we chose). Today, senators are elected by popular vote, but we the people do not have an actual vote in the presedential election. You may decide on the answer to your question from that.