If you were legally parked, the person backing up is At Fault. If you were in a "No Parking" area, you are at fault.
The person who is backing out
The person who drove their car into the parked car.
Come on, you know the answer to this. The person driving the car that caused the damage to the two parked cars is responsible for all damage. Who else would be at fault? Accept responsibility for your actions.
Some people incorrectly believe: "It is the parked car driver that is at fault because the car was parked past the sign." However, a parked car does not have the ability to see and avoid other cars; the drivers of the other cars are responsible for trying to avoid hitting any object that may be standing in the way, regardless of how it got there or whether it happens to be there legally. Could I legally crash into a parked car simply because it's time ran out on the parking meter? Parking laws rarely have anything to do with liability to other drivers who crash into each other. On the other hand, if the illegally parked car was violating a view to a intersection approach, and two OTHER cars collide "because of it", then the parking law COULD apply and may serve to apportion fault to the driver of the parked car who created the specific hazard against which the sign was posted, but most of the blame is on the other drivers who failed to exercise caution while driving. It still doesn't give someone the roght to drive into it.
The driver of the backing vehicle. The fact that the car was parked illegally is irrelevant. The onus is always on the driver of a moving vehicle to ensure the way is clear before backing up.
They put them on there backs and carry them across the treacherous surface of the cell membrane
because of carless boat drivers who boat over them and cut their backs with their propellers
If there is a person on the horse, the person on the horse but if there isn't then the horse or if the car was parked right behind the horse then the person who drives the car.
Either walk on the otehr side of the street or just turn their backs and ignore him
Its passing from side to side - e.g. Passing across the backs in an attacking formation
2 reasons so i heard their backs are wet from their "greasy" hair or they just got done swimming across the border its not right but that's how it started
Jim Bertelson, Ted Koy, and Steve Worster. James Street was the quarterback.
This is called "rubbernecking delay."
You hit a parked vehicle. No matter how or where it was parked, you are responsible for the damages. If you hit the car, you could have seen the car if you had been looking. You have no insurance which is a violation of the law. Pay the owner of the car you hit and accept responsibility for your poor driving, and stop trying to blame this on how the vehicle you hit was parked. It is your fault plain and simple.
The person who is backing out of the driveway is completely at fault. Even if the other party was illegally parked, the driver of the other vehicle has the responsibility to look behind them for clearance.
This can go either way, most often it is the person who was backing out that is at fault. witnesses would be great to prove this is what happened.
It is the fault of the person backing out. You have the right-of-way if you are driving in a usual and safe manor. The person who hit you should be cited for "backing without caution".
Yes they do have backs
On the backs of animals. And if you mean a vague geographic definition, they did have boats that they used more like modern barges
No, the bleacher seats do not have backs. Only the seats in the grandstand have backs. Bleacher seating by its very definition means no backs.
Full backs (left backs and right backs) usually wear 2 or 3.
There are the push on,locking backs,screw on backs,and plastic stoppers
on their backs
Off our backs was created in 1970.