Your boyfriends brown eyes will be dominant, though there is a chance that your child could have blue eyes. I'm not sure if there's an exact percentage, but it wont be high. Brown is very dominant. Especially because of the fact that both his parents have brown eyes as well.
Your baby will most likely have blue or brown eyes. It's a fifty-fifty chance. If I'm wrong, then your baby could have green eyes, too.
You could have either colour though its most likely to be brown.
The gene that causes blue pigmentation of the eyes is a recessive gene. The parents both have to have that recessive gene for the child to have blue eyes. of course if the descendants of the baby have blue eyes or the ancestors
Yes. Brown eye gene = B Blue eye gene = b Each person has two copies of the eye color gene in their genome, one inherited from each parent. Now if both parents only carry the gene for brown eyes, BB and BB, then their child will receive one B from each parent, ending up as BB. The same works for blue eyes, if that's the only gene both parents carry, bb and bb. Each parents gives on b to the child, who ends up as bb. If you have one parent who only has the gene for brown eyes, BB, and one parent who only has the gene for blue eyes, bb, then all the children will have brown eyes. Example: One parent gives a B, the other gives a b. Bb = brown eyes. Here's why: When you have two alleles (coding sequences) from genes that are at odds with each other, one version will override the the other. When dealing with eye color, B always dominates b. But these children now carry the b gene in them, and could pass it down to their own children. Some of them, depending on the other parent, could end up with blue eyes. If one parent is Bb, and the other is bb, then each time they have a child, there is a 50% chance it will have blue eyes. Example: First parent is Bb, second parent is bb, then their children will end up as either Bb, bb, Bb, bb. If both parents carry the genes for brown eyes and blue eyes, then each time they have a child, there is a 25% chance it will have blue eyes. Example: First parent is Bb, second parent is Bb, then their children will end up as either BB, Bb, Bb, bb.
Yes, if one of the son's relatives have blue eyes Yes. If both parents have blue eyes the child would have blue eyes. If the mother has blue and the father has brown the child can have blue or brown eyes.
Brown eye gene = B Blue eye gene = b Each person has two copies of the eye color gene in their genome, one inherited from each parent. Now if both parents only carry the gene for brown eyes, BB and BB, then their child will receive one B from each parent, ending up as BB. The same works for blue eyes, if that's the only gene both parents carry, bb and bb. Each parents gives on b to the child, who ends up as bb. In this case the child will have a 50:50 chance of brown eyes if the father carries the gene for blue. But if he carries both genes for brown the child will have brown eyes.
Brown eye gene = B Blue eye gene = b Each person has two copies of the eye color gene in their genome, one inherited from each parent. Now if both parents only carry the gene for brown eyes, BB and BB, then their child will receive one B from each parent, ending up as BB. The same works for blue eyes, if that's the only gene both parents carry, bb and bb. Each parents gives on b to the child, who ends up as bb. If you have one parent who only has the gene for brown eyes, BB, and one parent who only has the gene for blue eyes, bb, then all the children will have brown eyes. Example: One parent gives a B, the other gives a b. Bb = brown eyes. Here's why: When you have two alleles (coding sequences) from genes that are at odds with each other, one version will override the the other. When dealing with eye color, B always dominates b. But these children now carry the b gene in them, and could pass it down to their own children. Some of them, depending on the other parent, could end up with blue eyes. If one parent is Bb, and the other is bb, then each time they have a child, there is a 50% chance it will have blue eyes. Example: First parent is Bb, second parent is bb, then their children will end up as either Bb, bb, Bb, bb. If both parents carry the genes for brown eyes and blue eyes, then each time they have a child, there is a 25% chance it will have blue eyes. Example: First parent is Bb, second parent is Bb, then their children will end up as either BB, Bb, Bb, bb.
if your parents have different color eyes: if eyes are not brown, no brown gene lets say one green other brown. green parent may have green/blue gene. brown parent may have brown/green gene. your eyes might be blue. 1/4 chance of it.
The genetics of eye color are more complex than previously thought. Almost any parent-child combination of eye colors can occur.
If a parent has a female child, that would be the parent's daughter.
Black because the brown and red would make some darkish color and the black would mix of overpower that
The gene that causes blue pigmentation of the eyes is a recessive gene. The parents both have to have that recessive gene for the child to have blue eyes. of course if the descendants of the baby have blue eyes or the ancestors
The genetics of eye color are more complex than previously understood. Almost any parent-child combination of eye colors can occur.
That would be called genes. Genes is when a characteristic is past on from a mother to its child or a father to its child.
it depends on which geans are dominate the fathers are dominate the child will have blue eyes if the mother genes r, than it would have brown. sometimes it can have mixed colored eyes or even a diff color because someone in 1 theirs fam had it.
Uhhh . . . there is another parent involved that affects hair and eye color. OTHER ANSWER: Yes, the above answer is right as well, but it's all genetics. Whoever (you or your partners') hair is the dominant (rather than recessive trait) trait, that child will get it. It's all just genetic chance of what color hair and eyes it will have.
Well, they can but they would be lying. The parent is kicking them out of the house, the child is not running away; sooner or later the police (if the parent did call the child in as a runaway) would probably figure out the child did not runaway and the child was kicked out. If the parents kicked them out, then why would they call the child in as a missing if they didn't want them?
If I were a parent I would not let my child have a ceel phone until they where 16.
Your parent would file for child support from the other parent and you would be living with them.