Under UK Child Support law, the CSA would order the test and if he is proved to be the father he would pay for the test after the event.
If the father is unknown, you can't file for support.
First, don't pay anything until paternity is established. If the child is still a minor, you will most likely have to pay current (ongoing) support. However, based on the facts you describe, you have a good argument that you should not have to pay retroactive support.
Generally, a birth certificate includes the father's name only if that man has signed an acknowlegment of paternity.
Nothing happen's but the child will live with the tag of "father unknown" for the rest of their life. Paternity is presumed if the parents were married at the time of the child's birth. If the parents were not married, paternity can also be established by signing an acknowledgment of paternity or/and by genetic testing (DNA).
A paternity test would need to be done before this process could even begin. Without any verification that the child is his, she'd have no case, although he could be compelled by the courts and/or his unit to submit to a paternity test.
aok dont play... Before support is ordered, paternity must be established. I.e., promiscuity has its price and, unfortunately, it's the child(ren) who will suffer the most ... I assume she is demanding all the men in her town take a DNA test to see whose the father?
In many states, yes, but there's a drawback. If she really does know who the father is, she can still stop the support against the stepfather, as any time, than file for retroactive child support against the bio dad. This has been turning up in a number of paternity fraud cases of late.
By signing a birth certificate you are stating that you are the parent and waving right to a paternity or maternity test. or signing you up as a commercial vessel into the sea of commerce, down a berthing canal to go and try and make the man money... our parents in signing the birth certificate unwittingly signed our rights away to be held by the state. we are then brought into "dock" when we do something wrong. A birth certificate is a powerful document that is used to trade and they are held in a trust holding with you being the unknown beneficiary of all that is within that trust. see http://www.winstonshroutsolutionsincommerce.com/
Toward the Unknown - 1956 is rated/received certificates of: Finland:K-12 Sweden:15 USA:Approved (certificate #17997)
The answer depends on your marital status. An unmarried mother has sole custody of her child in most jurisdictions unless and until the father has established his paternity in court and requested joint custody. If married, it is called 'abandonment' and you have it automatically when he left you. If he returned to your life at a later time, he would have to pay back child support. The court would never allow him full custody if he just abandoned you, unless you were proven unfit to be a mother. Here is a tip, when the baby is born, do not put the father's name in the blank on the birth certificate. Just have them leave it blank, do not put "unknown" or the real father could use that against you saying you slept around and don't even know the real father. Leaving it blank means he will have to prove his paternity in order to have visitation. Most guys (especially the type who run away) will not go through the trouble. If the couple are married the mother must place the spouse's name on the birth certificate or sign an affidavit stating that the spouse is not the father of the child. Such action will negate any possibility of support or total custody paternity has been established. If the couple are not married the law presumes that the mother has full custodial rights until the alleged father has established paternity and has received custodial rights from the court.
No, since they are not your biological parents.
Because your ugly