Whose name is the phone in?
for what?
no
yes see links below
No. The parent with custodial rights is totally liable especially since the child was living with you while it happened.AnswerThat depends on several factors such as why the coverage was canceled, when it was canceled, who allowed the child to drive the car, whether the issue is addressed in the separation agreement, etc. If the custodial parent canceled insurance coverage for a reason and the non-custodial parent allowed the child to drive in spite of the cancellation, the non-custodial parent may be liable. If the child wrecked a car and as a result the custodial parent canceled the insurance coverage so they could no longer drive, the non-custodial parent would be liable if they continue to allow the child to operate a vehicle.
If you're the noncustodial parent, you might be liable. The fact that your husband has a child by someone else is irrelevant to this.
If the parents are divorced the school system is doing its job it should ask for a copy of the decree that states the custody arrangement. The school system needs that information for its own legal purposes. It could be liable for releasing the child to the non-custodial parent.If the parents are divorced the school system is doing its job it should ask for a copy of the decree that states the custody arrangement. The school system needs that information for its own legal purposes. It could be liable for releasing the child to the non-custodial parent.If the parents are divorced the school system is doing its job it should ask for a copy of the decree that states the custody arrangement. The school system needs that information for its own legal purposes. It could be liable for releasing the child to the non-custodial parent.If the parents are divorced the school system is doing its job it should ask for a copy of the decree that states the custody arrangement. The school system needs that information for its own legal purposes. It could be liable for releasing the child to the non-custodial parent.
It just depends on whether you are liable for the acts of your grandchild or not. It might be that the childs parents are legally liable for their acts in your jurisdiction. Not knowing your local regulations, theres not enough information in your question to answer properly. In general though, If you are not liable, then your insurance would not need to cover it because your not responsible. If you are liable then it should be covered under your liability coverage but not under your property coverage terms because it's not your property.
primary
You are no longer liable provided you notified dmv. Sounds like the new owner lost it.
When the State assumes guardianship of a child, both parents become liable for child support, payable to the State as reimbursement.
In most countries he will be committing a criminal offense (bigamy) and will be liable to arrest and may be sentenced to a custodial term if convicted. Further, his second marriage will be invalid.
And International Law. You can file for custody, but only Cuba actively enforces foreign custody orders for fathers. You can file a motion to place child support on hold, but that means you put it into a trust fund, not spend it.