0
Most peasants were serfs. Serfs were people who could not lawfully leave the place where they were born. Though bound to the land, serfs were not slaves. If a lord transferred ownership of land, the serfs went with it. Their lords could not sell or buy them, but most of what their labor produced belonged to the lord.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoYes and no. In the modern sense of ownership, no, serfs did not own land. But neither did the lord of the manor. Very little property was "fee simple" in the middle ages, meaning having one clear owner who controlled the land without outside obligations. Depending on his exact status, a serf would owe some combinations of rents, fees, and labor for access to farm land under the manor system. The lord of the manor did not really "own" the land, however, as if he held the land from a greater lord he would owe either money or military service for the right to the manor. The serf by tradition could not be driven from his land or sold to another lord like a slave. The lord of the manor could not be deprived of his fief by his own lord without significant cause. So in short, for any given piece of land there was a web of obligations, responsibilities, and duties related to that piece of land. Many different people would have both rights and duties related to a given property.
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoi like turtles oh and because they could not leave the manor
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is most accurate about the serfs?
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
When did the manorial system begin?
The manorial system became firmly established in the Middle Ages, about the time of Charlemagne. Its origins and most important characteristics, however, were in the villa system of the Roman Empire; the coloni of the villas were bound to the soil in the same way serfs were on manors, and the coloni and serfs had the same duties. The laws binding coloni to the soil were enacted by Constantine I in 330 AD.
Many peasant were serf How was a serf different from slave?
Many of peasants on the manors were serfs. The serfs were part of the property. It a lord sold his manor, the new lord would own the serfs as well as the land. Unlike slaves, however, serfs could not be sold without the land.
How did a lord exert power over the peasants?
Lord had to protect their serfs because the relationship between the lords and the serfs was one of mutual obligation. It was a sort of contract, under which each party got benefit, but each party had responsibilities. The serfs gave the lords labor. They also had given up their rights to move away from the manors and were bound to the soil, as they say. This was a two-way thing, however; the serfs did not have a right to move away from the manor, but the lords did not have the right to make them move away from the manor. They lords gave the serfs fields to farm, a place to live, and protection. The protection they provided was from armies, raiders, and criminals, but it also extended to other things, and might, in theory, include provision of food if there was a famine.
Could the serfs own the land that they farmed?
Serfs did not own land, and this was part of what made them serfs. Serfs were not slaves, but they were not free either. They were bound to the soil, which meant they could not legally leave the manor they lived on to live somewhere else. They did not have a right to leave, but they did have a right to farm the land. They could choose what to farm, but not where to farm. They often farmed communally, with other serfs of the same manor, but they nearly always had plots of land assigned to them for their own personal use. In exchange for giving the lord of the manor a part of their crop, they got the land, their homes, and protection. It was a system of mutual support and mutual obligation.
What way were serfs bound to the soil?
i like turtles oh and because they could not leave the manor
What is most accurate about the serfs?
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
What is the most accurate statement about serfs?
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
The Use of the word bound to?
Serfs were bound to the fief and their lord.
When did the manorial system begin?
The manorial system became firmly established in the Middle Ages, about the time of Charlemagne. Its origins and most important characteristics, however, were in the villa system of the Roman Empire; the coloni of the villas were bound to the soil in the same way serfs were on manors, and the coloni and serfs had the same duties. The laws binding coloni to the soil were enacted by Constantine I in 330 AD.
When did the manorialism begin?
The manorial system became firmly established in the Middle Ages, about the time of Charlemagne. Its origins and most important characteristics, however, were in the villa system of the Roman Empire; the coloni of the villas were bound to the soil in the same way serfs were on manors, and the coloni and serfs had the same duties. The laws binding coloni to the soil were enacted by Constantine I in 330 AD.
Did serfs sell land?
Serfs did not own land. In fact they were bound to the land they lived on and were not permitted to leave it.
How were serfs different from free peasants on medieval manor?
1st Answer:The word "serf" is Latin for slave, so they were slaves. Peasants were not slaves they were tenant farmers working the land for the king and his nobles.2nd Answer:The serfs were bound to the soil, meaning that serfs could not move away from the manor on which they lived. The deal was two way, however, and the lord could not make them move away.By contrast, free peasants were not bound to the soil. They were allowed to move away, but the lord of the manor could also fire them from their jobs and kick them out of their homes.Serfs and freemen alike paid rent. Freemen were not usually organized the same way serfs were. And the rent they paid was more commonly money, where the serfs' rent was commonly in labor or a share of a crop.The Latin word for slave was "servus." Deriving a description of the serf of the Middle Ages from a word from ancient Rome is not going to work, even though the word is related. They were different cultures, and the words had different meanings.
What is a peasant bound to the soil?
A serf is a peasant bound/set to the land/soil
What people in Russia who were bound to the land and worked for a lord?
easy serfs
What title was given to the poor who were bound to the land of the vassal or lord they served?
They were the serfs.
Many peasant were serf How was a serf different from slave?
Many of peasants on the manors were serfs. The serfs were part of the property. It a lord sold his manor, the new lord would own the serfs as well as the land. Unlike slaves, however, serfs could not be sold without the land.
