It can be held to be valid. If the parties are acting as if both parties have signed it, it will be enforced.
A contract is valid when there is a meeting of the minds. Once a contract is signed, it cannot be changed unless written as an addendum and signed by all parties concerned. A verbal agreement cannot override a written agreement.
The word attest means to formally (or legally) state. And yes, contracts need to be signed by both parties, to be legally valid.
Valid elements of a contract include both parties signatures. A contract must also include both parties agreeing on the terms of the contract.
The contract is not enforceable unless both parties signed it. If the sellers changed their mind and didn't sign then you don't have a contract.
If one of the fee owners didn't sign the contract then you don't have a valid contract. In order for the contract to purchase land and build on it to be valid and binding on the parties it must be signed by all of the purchasers and all of the fee owners.
any signed contract is valid, when you mailed it back, did you register it? this is to make sure that the other person received it.
No, there is no requirement to have a copy. If you want to enforce the contract, having a copy is important. And it should be a signed copy to take to court.
If the contract was supposedly made for a co-signer and lead signer then no, it would be non-valid if not signed by both parties.
Yes. A contract or agreement need not be written on a typewriter or computer to be valid, as long as it is signed by both parties.
No
The issue of the notary is not important. The issue is the type of contract, the wording and if the contract is valid under US not HK law.
A valid contract is an agreement enforceable by law. A Valid Contract is defined under Sec 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, of 1872. To know the essential features of forming a valid contract, please refer to Desire 4 Legal Knowledge