Question is worded a little strangely, but, yes, it sounds like it is a valid contract. The agent presented the owner's contract, and you apparently agreed to it, by signing it.
probly
Did a court adjudicate the tenant as incompetent? Then, if and when the landlord sues, that would provide the basis for a defense. You can't stop the landlord from trying to recover damages.
Any item that was present at the time of rental or lease signing, if damaged, is to be repaired to the best ability of the tenant, or if repair is not possible, then the landlord is entitled to collect damages. Before the lease was signed, there should have been a "walk through" with the landlord or their appointed agent, and this item should have been removed from the property before the tenant took possession.
Any agreement that affects the property must be signed by all the owners or it is not enforceable. It would need to be signed by all of the joint tenants.
Yes it might effect the tenant for whom you have co-signed have the apartment does not paythe rent then the co signer is reposible and you have to pay the rent.
Only the person who signed is a party to the contract. The tenant who didn't sign is not bound by the lease.
At conventions.
Of course!! In general it will always be the potential tenant who will sign the lease first.
here is the answer, Because the owners are losing money on tenant farmers. If I am wrong comment down below
yes !
In chapter 5 for The Grapes Of Wrath, the owners of the land suggest the tenant farmers to move to California.
In chapter 5 for The Grapes Of Wrath, the owners of the land suggest the tenant farmers to move to California.