The stickiest problem with choosing AIDS as the answer is that the baby would have had to have, at some time prior to the onset of AIDS, an immune system--evidenced by the infection. If there were no T-lymphocytes there would be no AIDS. You can't have a house fire without a house.
The best answer to this question is SCIDS because it doesn't require you to present hypothetical conditions that result in the birth of a baby with full-blown AIDS to justify the answer.
you could get very ill and worse you could die
no a person can have leukemia and still have a functioning immune system.
the answer is SCID
ramon. C
You can live, and it is classed as having SCIDS or being a bubble boy!
Ask a doctor
B. Scid
SCID
Their immune system would be compromised.
The reason the immune system is less effective in a person with HIV is because the virus attacks the immune system and makes it weaker.
AIDS can be found anywhere and affect anybody. It is a situation when a person who is HIV+ has his/her immune system destroyed and that is easy for other diseases to take advantage of that weak immune system. Now that can happen to anyone, anywhere.
It could slow down your immune system. (suppress your immune system) You could also pass out...:(
Yes
Die?
Because the HIV virus weakens the immune system of the body.
IF the immune system is strengthened the person is less susceptible to obtaining infections like pneumonia which can cause death if they don't have a fully functioning immune system
An immunologist
its immune system is low
Opportunist infection
HIV attacks the immune system. The name itself tells you when it is written in full form. HIV stands for Human immunodeficiency virus.