A repeating decimal is rational.
It's rational.
1.121212121212...is rational. It is a repeating decimal and it is rational.
No. Any terminating or repeating decimal is rational.
Any repeating decimal digits (this includes repetition after a certain point, e.g. 2.4510101010...) is a rational number.
It is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction in the form of 64/99
5.68 is rational. All decimal numbers that terminate, or end in one or more repeating digits are rational numbers.
1.121212121212...is rational. It is a repeating decimal and it is rational.
No. A rational number is any terminating numeral. A repeating decimal is irrational.
No. It is a rational number. Any repeating decimal or terminating decimal is rational.
it is rational becuase it's like a repeating decimal
A terminating decimal is a rational number. A non-terminating, repeating decimal is a rational number. A non-terminating, non-repeating decimal is an irrational number.
Rational. It can be expressed as a fraction of integers.
Any terminating decimal is rational. So are repeating (periodic) decimals.Any terminating decimal is rational. So are repeating (periodic) decimals.Any terminating decimal is rational. So are repeating (periodic) decimals.Any terminating decimal is rational. So are repeating (periodic) decimals.
No, any repeating decimal digit is a rational number. It only states that it is non-terminating decimal. It is rational.
Not always because any decimal that can be expressed as a fraction is a rational number as for example 0.33333.....repeating can be expressed as 1/3 which is a rational number
No. Any terminating or repeating decimal is rational.
Any repeating decimal digits (this includes repetition after a certain point, e.g. 2.4510101010...) is a rational number.
If its decimal representation is either terminating or a repeating number then it is rational. Otherwise it is irrational.