answersLogoWhite
History, Politics & Society

Is bias a secondary source?


Top Answer
User Avatar
Wiki User
Answered 2014-11-20 03:35:35

Bias is not a secondary source. In terms of historical and academic research and writing, secondary sources are articles and books written by historians and other academics. Secondary sources can be biased based on when the source was written and the author.Ê

001
๐Ÿ™
0
๐Ÿคจ
0
๐Ÿ˜ฎ
0
๐Ÿ˜‚
0
User Avatar

Your Answer

Loading...

Still Have Questions?

Related Questions

Which source more reliable primary or secondary?

in history a secondary source is more reliable because a primary source is usually biased but a secondary source looks back or reflects on a group of primary sources which are from different points of view.


Exercise 2 Classify each what items as either a primary source or a secondary source In a sentence or two identify a possible bias or other problem with the source?

# Primary # secondary # secondary # secondary # primary


Which question is most important to think about when using a secondary source?

Does the author have any hidden bias


What is a possible benefit of reading or looking at a primary source instead of a secondary?

Secondary sources interpret the primary for you, so they generally contain less raw data and more bias. In addition, because you're getting the information second-hand, you are more likely to get something wrong, because you're relying on the assumption that you understand the secondary source and that the secondary source understood the first.


What are the similarities of primary sources and secondary sources?

Both convey information, neither is an absolute objective source (some people conflate "primary" with "truth," and bias/ignorance extisted when this took place), and sometimes a source can be both primary or secondary.


Is looking at picture a primary source or a secondary source?

Secondary source


Is an encyclopedia a primary source?

No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.


Is a map a primary or secondary source?

a secondary source


Why should historians look for bias in a source?

Historians would be wise to look for bias in a source because bias can influence the way the writer relayed the information. Sources free from bias are to be the most trusted.


What are sources of bias?

There have been quite a few people who are the sources of a bias. Parents are usually a source of bias.


What do you call a secondary source which has primary sources in it?

It is a secondary source.


Is film of an event a primary source or a secondary source?

secondary


Is a biography a secondary source?

yes a biography is a secondary source


What is a example of a Secondary source?

a secondary source is a source of memory or imagination of a certain event.


Is a autobiography a primary source or secondary source?

is a auto biography a primary source or secondary source


What is a sentence for secondary source?

It is a good idea to confirm your data with a secondary source.


Define secondary source in literature review?

what is a secondary source review?


Is Pericles speech considered a primary or a secondary source?

is pericles primary source or secondary source


One important and unavoidable source of bias in maps is?

the decision about what to include and exclude.


When you examine the reliability of a secondary source you need to?

When it comes to the reliability of a secondary source you need to document your use of this source. You also need to not have an over-reliance on a secondary source.


Is Canterbury cathedral primary of secondary source?

secondary


What is the difference between a primary and a secondary source?

A primary source records an event. A secondary source examines the primary source.


What is a sentence for primary and secondary source?

the poster of albert einstein was a secondary source


Is a newspaper article a primary or secondary source?

an newspaper article will be an secondary source


How could you tell if the a Historical source is tainted with bias of a specitic agenda?

How could you tell if the a Historical source is tainted with bias of a specitic agenda?