No. CO2 is a product of combustion. If the concept that LeChatelier proposed is used, the CO2 actually gets in the way of the combustion reaction (burning).
No. Combustion requires oxygen and gives off CO2.
carbon itself does not support combustion ,but in forms like c02,it can
No,it does not.
yes as CO2 is a fire extinguisher
no.
No. Fire need fuel, oxygen, and heat to burn. Carbon dioxide is a product of most fires and can actually be used to put fires out.
This is because once the magnesium starts to burn, the uninhibited chemical reaction dominates the fire's need for oxygen (carbon dioxide usually puts fires out by displacing oxygen). The magnesium will continue to burn until there is nothing left to burn.
We need to find sources of renewable energy to generate electricity and drive our transport. At present all this is done largely by burning fossil fuels, which releases long-held carbon dioxide into the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. We also need to plant forests all over the world, which will absorb carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, release the oxygen and store the carbon.
There are natural greenhouse gases of water vapor and carbon dioxide that have kept the earth warm for millions of years. Humans are not causing them.But the greenhouse gases that are contributing to the enhanced greenhouse effect which is causing global warming are being emitted by the following human actions.Burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) in industry, transport and to generate electricity.Deforestation. We need trees to suck carbon dioxide out of the air.Cattle raising. Forests have been cut down for pasture and the animals belch methane (a greenhouse gas 21 times stronger than carbon dioxide).
Carbon + the oxygen in the air = carbon dioxcide. I would say you should have a fresh suply of air so the fire doesn't go out or you don't smother youself.
No. Fire need fuel, oxygen, and heat to burn. Carbon dioxide is a product of most fires and can actually be used to put fires out.
Carbon dioxide is one of the main pollutants causing global warming. By removing CO2 in the first place, a minimal amount is released into the atmosphere during the process of burning fuels.
The increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is a combination of increased input from vehicles and industry, and a decreased outtake due to large amounts of trees being cut down and not replaced.
Fire...I'm in middle school, and I know that... >=D
people need to recycle, and reduse carbon dioxide, reduce the amount of fossil fuels we use,
This is because once the magnesium starts to burn, the uninhibited chemical reaction dominates the fire's need for oxygen (carbon dioxide usually puts fires out by displacing oxygen). The magnesium will continue to burn until there is nothing left to burn.
Oxygen. Fuels need that to burn.
Carbon dioxide.
Plants need carbon dioxide for photosynthesis. Carbon dioxide is a gas
There is no need to conserve energy as such but there is a pressing need to conserve the type of energy that comes from forming chemical bonds between carbon and oxygen. This process produces the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide. This process in itself is OK provided it takes place as part of some short-term carbon cycle because the carbon dioxide is broken down again by photosynthesis in plants. What is damaging is to burn carbon that was separated out of atmospheric carbon dioxide millions of years ago, because this puts carbon dioxide into the atmosphere which natural mechanisms are unable to cope with, on account of its sheer mass coming in a short time. This is why burning fossil fuels like coal, oil and natural gas are damaging to the environment. A good example of what global warming can do is the planet Venus, where the atmosphere is 93% carbon dioxide and the surface temperature is 400-500 degrees C.
carbon dioxide
Carbon is the element of the life and fossil fuels.