0
Yes! Civillian rule is much better cus it is the power of the people while millitary rule is done through coercion.....
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Points on Military government is more suitable for Nigeria than Sivilian government?
Points on Military government is better than Civilian government
Are military rules better than civilian rules?
there are more rules in military than civilian
Civil rule preferable to military rule?
civilian rule is better than military rule because there is freedom and peace in the nation better than when the military was ruling us
What does civilian of the military mean?
Civilian control of the military is a doctrine in militaryand political science that places ultimate responsibility for a country's strategic decision-making in the hands of the civilian political leadership, rather than professional military officers.
What does civilian control of the military mean?
Civilian control of the military is a doctrine in militaryand political science that places ultimate responsibility for a country's strategic decision-making in the hands of the civilian political leadership, rather than professional military officers.
What clothing did the roman soldiers wear?
For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".
Is military rule better than civilian rule?
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a Dictatorship
Advantage of civilian regime?
It is more civilized and humane. NOBAMA
Civilian rule is better than Military rule?
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a dictatorship
Can military doctors be sued?
Yes, military doctors can be sued, but the process is different than suing civilian doctors. The doctrine of "Feres v. United States" prohibits active-duty military personnel from bringing medical malpractice claims against the federal government. However, there are some exceptions to this rule, such as cases involving civilian employees of the military or medical treatment provided to dependents of military personnel.
Can a non-military organization imprision the members of the three divisions of government and replace them with non corrupt politicians?
If we're speaking of the United States, the answer is yes.In fact, they must be imprisoned by a non-military court. Any military court that attempted to exact justice on a civilian in the United States would be in violation of the Constitution and it would be tantamount to a coup or revolution.The military in the United States is not at liberty to do anything more than detain a civilian, which they are then required to turn over to a civilian court.Any action that came against a member of the US government would have to come from a non-military organization in order to be deemed even remotely legal.
Bangledesh type of government?
That could be a possibility. Any govt will be better than Mr. 10% or Mr. Military..
