answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Copyright law is a civil matter. But sometimes it can stray into criminal law, if for example you download a movie illegally that is a civil matter, but if you then sell copies of that movie it is criminal.

To clarify, in the UK it is not illegal to buy 'pirate' DVDs but it is illegal to sell them.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is copyright law criminal or civil law are you tried in criminal or civil courts?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How is the local court system structured?

Most states have local trial courts--municipal, county, district, and small-claims courts. Millions of civil and criminal cases are tried at this level.


What is the Difference between civil and criminal tort liability?

Criminal negligence is an act of negligence that results in a crime-such as involuntary manslaughter which are tried in a criminal court. Tort negligence is negligence thought of as a "civil wrongdoing" which is addressed in civil courts.


Cases tried before a court of law are civil and what?

criminal


What type of crimes do Federal courts try?

The federal courts here numerous types of court cases. A few of the cases are maritime law, copyright cases, patent cases, and bankruptcy.


Can negligent doctors be tried in consumer courts?

this would be a negligent claim, so it would not be dealt with in cosumer courts. Negligence cases would be tried as a tort in civil court.


Cases tried before a court of law are two types civil and?

criminal


What jurisdiction do the inferior courts have what kind of cases do they hear?

Chapter 18 section 2. The inferior courts those beneaththe Supreme court are the core of the federal judicial system, hearing nearly all of the cases tried in federal courts. they hear cases, both originally and on appeal, and both criminal and civil cases.


Explain how O J Simpson was tried in both Civil and Criminal Courts found guilty in one not guilty in the other but no one posed the double jeopardy angle?

Criminal and Civil are different. A Criminal trial is on behalf of the People or State or such like against the accused. A Civil hearing is when one person or group or such like sues another or such like, usually for damages or rectification. Criminal take precedent over Civil and the burden of proof is higher in Criminal - 'Beyond a reasonable doubt' rather than 'On the balance of probabilities' in Civil. 'Double jeopardy' means you cannot be tried [Criminal trial] for the exact same crime twice - after a verdict has been reached the first time. In Civil once you have accepted the rectification, money or otherwise you cannot take the same action again against those you were successful against. O. J. was found not guilty in a criminal court but that did not debar a civil action for damages and in the Civil hearing he was not and could not be found guilty of the criminal charge of murder.


Where are felony criminal cases tried in virgina?

Circuit Courts, unless it is a federal felony, then it would be in US Distirct Court.


What is civil law give a sentence?

Civil law provides remedies for non-criminal disputes.Civil law provides remedies for non-criminal disputes.Civil law provides remedies for non-criminal disputes.Civil law provides remedies for non-criminal disputes.


The courts of appeals hear cases that have been appealed from what?

Twelve of the thirteen US Courts of Appeal Circuit Courts have territorial jurisdiction over appeals of general criminal and civil cases original tried in US District Courts. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has nationwide subject matter jurisdiction over cases originally heard in special courts, such as the US Court of Federal Claims, the US Court of International Trade, the Court of Veterans' Claims, and cases involving patent disputes, decisions made by government boards and departments, and other entities.


What assumptions underlie the courts decision that preventive detention is constitutional?

The big assumption in this case (Kansas v. Hendricks) is that there is some distinction between civil commitment and criminal imprisonment. If the Court said that involuntary commitment was criminal in nature, it would have violated the Double Jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment (because Hendricks had already been tried and convicted of his crime). However, because the Court characterized the commitment as "civil" in nature, it was able to avoid the Double Jeopardy clause altogether (because it only applies to being tried twice for the same criminal charge).