It may be "considered" safer, but there is no absolute reason why it would be. There are certainly many unibody vehicles that perform better in crash tests than others that are built body-on-frame.
The network doesn't need to see an entire frame before determining a collision has occured; as soon as it detects a transmission after or during the process of sending a frame there is a collision. Theoretically then it could be a part of a frame as small as a byte.
Identify the time frame involved with the "Revocation" of a drivers license
One frame can pass without causing a collision
It can vary from staet-to-state.
A random delay helps prevent the stations from experiencing another collision during the transmission.
This is a statement not a question. You need to frame a question to have an answer.
It all depends on the consumer laws of your particular state. A 'minor' collision with cosmetic body repairs - probably not. A "major" collision with much body and frame reconstruction - quite possibly - - especially if the damage and repair was so extensive as to be legally required to be re-titled with a "salvage" title.
It usually means that the frame was bent during the collision.
Manufactuers Statement of Origin. Where the engine, frame and parts came from.
It is not a large frame.
Yes, the strut or lower control arm could break and allow the axle to come apart. There may be damage to the frame, but there doesn't have to be.
The very end of the front portion of the vehicle's frame where the bumper attaches is considered the frame horn.