As with any ethical issue there are (at least) two sides to every debate, but in this case the terminology might confound the issue.
Cloning a gene simply means to make a copy of it and put it somewhere else. It could end up in the same organism (to over-express), or a different one (to heterologously express).
So far cloning genes into human embryos is universally unacceptable, but cloning genes into plants and microbes is common in research settings. There are also some animals that are genetically modified, which is wrong for some people, who object to experimenting on animals to begin with.
recombinant clone or chimeric DNA
Because if you take the genes from an older animalAnd use them to create a clone of that exact animal, it would still be born from the womb as a childHowever because the genes are already however many years old the newborn animals genes will be the same age so it will mature, and die fasterFor example Dolly the sheep was 7 years oldHer genes were cloned into a baby lambThis lambs genes were 7 years old so it had to catch up fasterTherefore... It aged faster
No you would not get hurt.
not personally, but it has been done.
Can genetic counselors tell couples the exact genes that they will pass on to their offspring?Read more: Can_genetic_counselors_tell_couples_the_exact_genes_that_they_will_pass_on_to_their_offspring
Yes, because the clone's genes will be exactly the same as the original's genes.
Dolly and the sheep from which she was cloned have identical genes.
A Clone !
Most likely because a clone is an exact replica of yourself. If you have cancer, your clones has the genes to have cancer.
A clone
a clone
Scientist must isolate and clone diseased genes in order to study them. A clone of the gene allows scientist to find an exact cure.
clone- group of indivdual organisms that have exactly the same genes
Yes, a clone is produced from a copy of the original organism's genes. However, gene expression might differ (I think), and end up producing different characteristics in the clone because different genes are taking effect.
AI would have to be the more morally acceptable one of the two, cloning is not very well accepted at this time.
That would depend, among other things, on what you did with them afterward.
No, because a daughter does not have exact genetics because she would have the mothers genes as well. Whereas a sister would have the same genes as her brother.