No. The comparative of an adjective cannot be used that way. Instead use "It is not as much worse as that is." or just change it to "It is not as bad as that".
It does, as does the word Englishes. The correct use of "informations" would be very rare; most people probably never ever use it in the plural. You are safest if you stick to "information".
You have the correct spelling above, exercise.
No. Use 'indescribable'.
I think that it is always correct.
"So few" is correct for things that may be counted.
Yes, but it is normally more correct to use the word people.
Requests is an English word (plural of request), however we can not say if your use of the word is correct English because you have failed to say in your question how you were trying to use it.
No, the word requiz is not a word. There is not a definition for this word nor part of speech listed and it is not correct to use it in the English language.
Yes, but only in some circumstances!
The word "ruelly" does not exist in English, so it cannot be used in a sentence.
It is a recent addition to the English language. If you are dealing with traditionalists it might be wiser to use forthcoming.
The manners of people requesting help are getting worse.
The correct spelling of the word is equipment.(The vast majoority of English words use a letter U after Q.)
No it is not correct.
It does, as does the word Englishes. The correct use of "informations" would be very rare; most people probably never ever use it in the plural. You are safest if you stick to "information".
People used to talk about atomic power and atomic bombs, but this is not correct, nuclear is the correct word to use. Why do you want another word? Nuclear means to do with the nucleus. 'Kernel' is another word which means the center of a body but in English we use it for nuts. In German nucleus is 'kern', and they have 'kernkraftwerke' for nuclear engineering, but why use a German word?
No it's not correct. The word "am" only sounds grammatically correct with the pronoun of I