0
Is it true that even if you are good at mathematics you will suck at engineering?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
No.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is it true that if you are good at mathematics you suck at engineering?
The statement seems absurd to me.
Do you suck at physics and engineering if you are good at math but bad at chemistry and programming?
No. You do not suck. You can truly . . . whatever the opposite is.
Is it true that if you are good at mathematics you suck at physics along with engineering?
I very much doubt it. You need Mathematics to understand Physics and Engineering. Perhaps if you are transfixed by the sheer almost crystalline beauty of Number Theory or the deep pools of structure hidden in the set of Primes then you may not have much interest in such mundane subjects as physics or engineering.If this is the case then you are not merely "good" at maths.You are a Born Mathematician.
Do you suck at physics and engineering if you are good at math but bad at programming chemistry and essay writing?
No. You do not suck. You can truly . . . whatever the opposite is.
Do you suck at physics chemistry and engineering if you are good at math but bad at programming and essay writing?
No. You do not suck. You can truly . . . whatever the opposite is.
Do you suck at physics and chemistry and engineering if you are good at math but bad at programming?
Such a correlation is absurd.
Do you suck at physics chemistry and engineering if you are good at math but bad at computer programming?
Not necessarily.
Do you suck at engineering if you are good at math but bad at programming physics chemistry and engineering?
Your sentence is a tautology: trimming it a bit yields:"Do you suck at engineering if you are [...] bad at [...] engineering?"The other subjects add nothing; you could throw in polo and underwater basketweaving as well (on either the "good" or "bad" side) and the sentence would still be true.If this is an example of your typical thought process, I can pretty much conclude that yeah, you're bad at engineering, physics, chemistry, and programming, and I could even be specific as to why. Also, you're not nearly as good at math as you think you are (you might be good at arithmetic, which is something different).
Do you suck at physics and engineering if you are good at math but bad at chemistry computer science and programming?
That depends on the individual
Will you suck at physics and engineering if you are good at math but bad at computer science?
I don't think so! Long before there were computers (and computer science), there were brilliant physics and engineering students and they obviously were good at math.
Do you suck at physics and engineering if you are good at math but bad at computer science?
I don't think so! Long before there were computers (and computer science), there were brilliant physics and engineering students and they obviously were good at math.
Do you suck at physics and engineering if you are good at math but bad at programming?
If anybody tries to sell you on a correlation like that, I've got news for you: They're not that good at math. No such connection is possible. There are thousands of gifted Engineers and Physicists, even today, who never touched a computer or wrote a program.
