answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

That depends on who it is redistributed to. If wealth were redistributed to individuals (say for example to make people's shares more equal), but remained privately owned and controlled by individuals, that would not be socialism. But if it were redistributed to collective ownership in any form, or retained in government ownership, or if its use were controlled by the government despite different assets nominally belonging privately to individuals that would be socialism.

Whether the USA needs socialism, and whether socialism goes against human nature, and whether redistributive change is counterproductive to the entire society are questions that are not related to which forms of redistribution are socialist.

NOTE: it is well worth paying close attention to the difference between a redistribution of wealth and a redistribution of income.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

paulbenn

Lvl 13
2y ago

In Socialism the resources of the planet belong to all the people in common, so Yes, I suppose that counts as redistribution of wealth.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is redistribution of wealth socialism
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the cause of Distribution of wealth?

The redistribution of wealth is aimed at enhancing levels of economic equality.


What is the redistribution of health?

I think you mean redistribution of wealth?Redistribution of wealth is the transfer of income, wealth or property from some individuals to others caused by a social mechanism such as taxation, monetary policies, welfare, nationalization, charity or tort law.[1] Most often it refers to progressive redistribution, from the rich to the poor, although it may also refer to regressive redistribution, from the poor to the rich.[2] The desirability and effects of redistribution are actively debated on ethical and economic grounds.-Wikipedia. :)Basically meaning, the more money you make, the more taxes you pay, because the government is distributing wealth.


Is Redistribution of wealth called stability?

Redistribution of wealth equates to nothing more than the government taking what you earned with your time and sweat and basically giving it away. This isn't fair, it's communism.


Would redistributing incomes from the rich to the poor reduce the overall problem in scarcity?

No. Redistribution would not improve the supply, but rather the demand for goods. * Although "control" of the country's wealth is in the hands of a minority, there would not be enough revenue from income redistribution to improve the average lifestyle: that would require the redistribution of income-producing resources, which is socialism or communism. Once there was no advantage to self-improvement, the "rich" would stop earning money that they could not keep.


What is community finance?

Community finance incolces the redistribution of wealth by the communist overseer.


Why would people with wealth be for redistribution of wealth?

So the sick and elderly don't have to survive on the streets if a financial catastrophe hits their lives.


Did Karl Marx believe in the concept of redistribution of wealth?

Yes, Karl Marx believed in the redistribution of wealth as a core tenet of his political and economic philosophy. He argued for the redistribution of wealth to address economic inequality and advocated for the abolition of private property in order to create a more equitable society.


Does President Obama want redistribution of wealth?

Yes, he has made that clear many times.


What is one of the goals of the equal distribution of wealth?

Socialism


What is equal distribution of wealth in economics?

Equal distribution of wealth is associated with the ideas of Communism and Socialism.


What was the name of Huey Long's program to help the poor through the redistribution of money?

Share Our Wealth.


What is the philosophy advocating equal distribution of wealth?

Socialism and Communism.