0
Yes. If NASA had been permitted to patent the tech it created, they would not have to spend one dime of taxpayer money. The spinoff of NASA is tremendous. You are reading these words on a descendant of NASA's DSKY computer, powered by a descendant of NASA's Integrated Circuit CPU, the first computer on a chip. If you aren't a waste of money, then neither is NASA!
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is space exploration worth it?
yes
Why is space exploration a waste of money?
NASA wastes money like farming wastes seed.If NASA had been permitted to patent the tech it created, they would not have to spend one dime of taxpayer money. The spinoff of NASA is tremendous. You are reading these words on a descendant of NASA's DSKY computer, powered by a descendant of NASA's Integrated Circuit CPU. If you aren't a waste of money, then neither is NASA!Space ExplorationIs it a waste of money? Research that has led to the exploration of space has given us technologies that would have been impossible otherwise. The space industry has advanced the knowledge of science so much that it is impossible to comprehend all of the ways that our lives have been improved. The future of space exploration holds a promise of an amazing future for the human species. Complex question, complex answer. This answer is addressing the questions of government expenditure on civilian space programs. First, it is a good idea to identify what "waste" means. In this case, it can be identified as the differences in benefit attained by putting the monies elsewhere.It is also important how you define "benefit", whether you are defining it solely in terms of GDP, quality of life, and so on. You can always construct an argument that space is a waste of money if your sole definition of benefit is social welfare, for example. Likewise, government space exploration produces a lot of scientific knowledge, most of which has no immediate commercial application. Therefore, GDP may not be the best metric to use if you are concerned with efficacy of the spending of R&D funds, as opposed to spending the money on semiconductor research or biotech.Last, there is the concept of diminishing returns. Like any production system, increasing spending an extra billion on space exploration will do less than the previous billion spent. The question then becomes, at what point does spending another billion on social welfare, or paying down national debt, or lowering taxes yield more benefit than the equivalent money being spent on a space program?There is no cut and dried answer, but it should be obvious from the above that -some- amount of spending on a space program is optimal, and it would be fallacious to say that space exploration in general is a waste. The hard part is determining just how much spending on space is worthwhile. It is not a waste of money. It helps in the future but also loses money at the same time. It will be always be a helpful thing later on. We do lose tons of money and gain some at the same time but it is worth it. NASA had a budget of $16.2 billion with human spaceflight division but also other engineering projects and science funds by NASA.----------------------Additional Answer:It's only a waste when the funds are abused by coruption or incompatance. Otherwise space Exploration is an investment.An urgent investment.But not necessarily for the conventional wisdom reasons, which includeresearching new materials and technology, and of course mankind's ferocious curiosity and appetite for knowledge.Unfortunately our technology is advancing faster then human maturity as a race. Our technology will soon be greater then we are mentally capable to properly steward. This enormous responsibility is already out of control. Much like giving a loaded bazooka to a baby. It has been estimated that within a few decades, even the regular Joe or Jane on the street with have technology enough to destroy the planet as an individual. Lets hope he or she doesn't wake up one morning mad at the world with a hangover or severe PMS.We need space exploration to colonize off earth, in order to save our race.Why save the race anyway one might ask? Please consider music, art and love.Consider literature and history, and the young brilliant loving children yet tobe born. Was it, and will it will all have been a great big waste?
What is a space shuttle worth?
A space shuttle is worth over a thousand dollors, maybe millions!
Were the Apollo missions worth the cost and risk?
As it was a science exploration and discovery by man, it was worth it, we will know the real benefits much later.
Is space exploration worth the high costs?
This is a matter of personal opinion.It is clear, however, that substantial engineering and scientific progress has been made in the pursuit of space exploration which benefit the rest of the human race in our day to day lives. Today, we also benefit from satellite communication and TV which would not be possible without space exploration. GPS units which help us find our ways in cars is a direct result of having satellite in space.Probably one of the most famous challenges issued by a president of the United States of America to its people was the now famous challenge by John F Kennedy on May 25th, 1961 for US to put a man on the moon and return him safely to earth. The speech was made at a time when the USA was feeling unsure of its ability to compete with Russia (who had launched Spunik-1 in 1954). The challenge became a rallying cry with which the US were able to challenge the Soviet Union; not only in space but in daily life on earth. I.e. the pursuit of space exploration gave US hope in an uncertain world and something to gather around and concentrate on.Of course, you can always argue if the total price tag is worth it, and if the money could have been spend better on universal health care and free education. It is a difficult choice and the answer will differ from person to person.
Is space exploration worth it?
yes
How will space station help in the exploration of space?
I think that they will all be good to go and that they will all together help the world that we live in by exploring the world and the unknown and i think that is definitely worth all the money that we are spending on this. i think that they are also doing this all because they can and they will until someone stops them form doing this.
Why would the cost of space exploration not be worth it?
Just get a life !
Which VCR Movies are worth money?
Space jam
Why is space exploration a waste of money?
NASA wastes money like farming wastes seed.If NASA had been permitted to patent the tech it created, they would not have to spend one dime of taxpayer money. The spinoff of NASA is tremendous. You are reading these words on a descendant of NASA's DSKY computer, powered by a descendant of NASA's Integrated Circuit CPU. If you aren't a waste of money, then neither is NASA!Space ExplorationIs it a waste of money? Research that has led to the exploration of space has given us technologies that would have been impossible otherwise. The space industry has advanced the knowledge of science so much that it is impossible to comprehend all of the ways that our lives have been improved. The future of space exploration holds a promise of an amazing future for the human species. Complex question, complex answer. This answer is addressing the questions of government expenditure on civilian space programs. First, it is a good idea to identify what "waste" means. In this case, it can be identified as the differences in benefit attained by putting the monies elsewhere.It is also important how you define "benefit", whether you are defining it solely in terms of GDP, quality of life, and so on. You can always construct an argument that space is a waste of money if your sole definition of benefit is social welfare, for example. Likewise, government space exploration produces a lot of scientific knowledge, most of which has no immediate commercial application. Therefore, GDP may not be the best metric to use if you are concerned with efficacy of the spending of R&D funds, as opposed to spending the money on semiconductor research or biotech.Last, there is the concept of diminishing returns. Like any production system, increasing spending an extra billion on space exploration will do less than the previous billion spent. The question then becomes, at what point does spending another billion on social welfare, or paying down national debt, or lowering taxes yield more benefit than the equivalent money being spent on a space program?There is no cut and dried answer, but it should be obvious from the above that -some- amount of spending on a space program is optimal, and it would be fallacious to say that space exploration in general is a waste. The hard part is determining just how much spending on space is worthwhile. It is not a waste of money. It helps in the future but also loses money at the same time. It will be always be a helpful thing later on. We do lose tons of money and gain some at the same time but it is worth it. NASA had a budget of $16.2 billion with human spaceflight division but also other engineering projects and science funds by NASA.----------------------Additional Answer:It's only a waste when the funds are abused by coruption or incompatance. Otherwise space Exploration is an investment.An urgent investment.But not necessarily for the conventional wisdom reasons, which includeresearching new materials and technology, and of course mankind's ferocious curiosity and appetite for knowledge.Unfortunately our technology is advancing faster then human maturity as a race. Our technology will soon be greater then we are mentally capable to properly steward. This enormous responsibility is already out of control. Much like giving a loaded bazooka to a baby. It has been estimated that within a few decades, even the regular Joe or Jane on the street with have technology enough to destroy the planet as an individual. Lets hope he or she doesn't wake up one morning mad at the world with a hangover or severe PMS.We need space exploration to colonize off earth, in order to save our race.Why save the race anyway one might ask? Please consider music, art and love.Consider literature and history, and the young brilliant loving children yet tobe born. Was it, and will it will all have been a great big waste?
When was this pistol made Colt Bisley 173566?
1897. IMO, worth spending the money to get it lettered by Colt
How much was spent in internet marketing?
It depend on how you far you want to go for it. Spending money for such activity is worth it.
Can you supercharge a 2007 dodge charger se?
you can super charge any engine that you want provided you are willing to spend the money and is it worth spending the money
What is the age of a colt frontier six shooter serial number 138096?
1891. IMHO, worth spending the money to get it lettered by Colt.
Is exploration worth the cost?
Yes.
Is-space exploration a waste of money?
here's NASA's answer For many years, space exploration has been a topic of much debate. When it began during the Cold War, public opinion mostly supported conquering the final frontier, however, this was largely due to a national desire to beat the Soviet Union in the "space race." Once the Cold War died out in the late 80s and early 90s, society was left with the burning question: Should the space program be ended, or should the government continue to fund voyages to the moon, Mars, and the rest of the solar system? Today, this question is still asked. Many claim that space exploration is a waste of money, yet, while opponents of the space program feel that it is sending money into space instead of using it for practical purposes here on Earth, the exploration of the solar system is one of the noblest pursuits of man, and has also led to many technologies which are used on Earth. The main argument against the continuation of space exploration is that it is expensive and uses money which could be put to better purposes. It is true every year in the United States, about 7 billion dollars goes into human space flight. To many, this may appear to be an enormous amount of money, but how much is it really? Consider that each year Americans spend 22 times this amount on alcohol. Consider that the government spends over 10 billion dollars in Iraq every month. Consider that the funding of NASA uses less than one percent of the government's budget. Consider that the United States government is currently trillions (yes, trillions) of dollars and debt, and ask yourself: How much is this really? If exploring the universe is a waste of money, are war and alcohol the nobler pursuits in which the taxpayers' money should be invested? When the money spent on the space program is put into perspective, it is clear that it is pocket change compared to what is spent on other, arguably useless ventures. Now this is not to say that there are no worthy causes on which this seven billion dollars could be spent if the space program was halted. Those who advocate the termination of space exploration say that it is almost cruel to spend money chasing unbeneficial dreams in outer space instead of solving world hunger or working toward world peace. Those who advocate the termination of the space program don't seem to be paying attention. Somehow they miss the irony that they are trying to end space exploration in order to fund world peace, while right under their noses, over 12 times as much money is being spent on a war. It would be far more reasonable to obtain money to spend on world issues from a war which is damaging world unity than from a program which, at worst, does the world no harm. In fact, NASA and space programs around the globe help promote international peace and cooperation. For example, the international space station is occupied by astronauts from several nations, and was built by many nations working together. Missions to Mars and other places would also most likely require the cooperation of several countries. With a closer look, we can see in the space program that which was not so apparent at a glance: Space exploration is not a waste of money which could be used to improve the world, but a noble pursuit which promotes world unity and is much cheaper than some activities which serve only to tear the world apart. In addition to contributing to world unity, the space program has many technological benefits. Hundreds of items which people enjoy today would never have been possible without studies conducted for space exploration. These "spin-off technologies" can be found everywhere and have served to improve the lives of humans all around the world. From scratch-resistant lenses to processes which can detect Breast cancer, NASA's space program has led to many ground breaking inventions and processes. For example, when NASA was looking for a more efficient way to store fuel, they came up with miniaturization. This process led to the development of the microprocessor, a main component of the modern day computer. Without the space program, this kind of technology may have taken much longer to be discovered, and computers could still be the size of a room today. Although there have been numerous other spin-off technologies which have been developed through NASA's exploration of space, one in particular stands out: the satellite. The impact of the satellite on modern society is huge. It makes possible countless technologies which many consider essential in modern times. From cell phones to GPS's to Satellite Television, the impact of the satellite can be seen everywhere. One very important area in which they are utilized is the monitoring of weather worldwide. Image the devastating impact that hurricanes such as Katrina would have had if no one had known that the storm was going to hit. Clearly, the technologies developed because of space exploration are well worth the money that is put into the space program. Without these developments, our world would be a much harder place to live in and many more lives would have been lost. Lastly, while the space program's opponents try to convince everyone that money put into the exploration of the solar system is being shipped into space, this is simply not true. Much of the money that is put into space exploration is used to pay employees. In other words, the space program provides hundreds and indirectly thousands of jobs within the United States. Although not all of NASA's money is used to pay employees directly, the rest of its budget does not simply disappear. NASA's spends its money on materials to build satellites, space shuttles, and other vehicles and technologies used in space exploration. Shockingly, all this money remains right here on earth, mostly in the U.S. Greater spending is always beneficial to the economy, and NASA's spending is no exception, despite what its opponents would like to believe. It is not difficult to realize that money invested in space exploration is not shipped away and does not vanish. It is circulated within the United States and given right back to Americans. All over the globe, the benefits of space exploration can be seen, and it is almost impossible to spend a single day without encountering dozens of ways in which the space program has improved the world. When we look closely, we realize it cannot be denied that because of the world unity it promotes, the jobs it provides, and the new technologies it creates, space exploration is well worth its cost and should be continued for many years to come. Sources: http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/11/is-space-exploration-worth-the-cost-a-freakonomics-quorum/ http://www.idebate.org/debatabase/topic_details.php?topicID=91 http://www.thespaceplace.com/nasa/spinoffs.html#Top http://aerospacescholars.jsc.nasa.gov/HAS/highlights/final-projects/view.cfm?id=B0BD5CEB-F1F6-B4D1-E03980F9CF82851E
What year is a colt single action revolver serial number 24698?
1874 or 1875. IMHO, worth spending the money to get a letter from Colt on it.
