No, they are not. The term supreme being is one way that people refer to concepts of deity. By itself, the word supreme is an adjective that means the highest quality, or most authoritative, or best example of something.
What makes a thing that thing, that same thing? If that what makes it that thing is/are still there after other changes then it is still the same thing.
The supreme purpose of our lives is to be the best human being we can be, and to experience life to the fullest, with appreciation and mindfulness.
as your self how to i get a girl? well girls are attracted to things. if i could be that thing then what girls will be attracted to me. Well one thing is different from another. each thing has its own being. being qua being would be to ask 'what the H#$$ is thing?' not how does a particular thing become into but how does anyting become into. being for the sake of being.
Yes, they can mean the same thing.
belief that a monarch's authority to rule comes from a supreme being
state of being mean the same thing as the subject and follow a verb of being
Basically the same as the supreme being of the Christians and Muslims. Bahá'ís simply talk about "God", appropriately translated into different languages.
Yes.
No. They're not even closely related to being the same thing.
Allah (or God in English); same God in Christianity and Judaism.
Yes, being thrify and being frugal are generally the same thing. They mean spending wisely, carefully, economically; not being wasteful with money or resources.
Agnostics are in the middle. They see no proof in their being a supreme being and no proof that their isn't a supreme being.
They mean the same thing.
No. As not all insane people are pyromaniacs, it follows that being insane and being a pyromaniac can not be the same thing (even if you assert that all pyromaniacs are by definition insane).
yes the supreme council of the union is same as the federal supreme council...
Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.Civil war in ancient Rome was the same thing as civil war anyplace else. It was an armed internal struggle between two (or more) factions each vieing for supreme power.
Yes.