No, "should of" should be "should have". The confusion comes from the way the contraction "should've" is pronounced. It sounds like "should of", but it's not.
He should HAVE known better.
The sentence "You should of known better" derives from "You should've known better"; "should of" sounds about like the way you say "should've".Of course "should've" is a contraction of "should have" - consequently it is correct to say either "You should have known better" or (being a bit informal) "You should've known better" but it is incorrect to WRITE "You should of known better" instead of "You should've known better."
NoThe sentence "You should of known better." derives from "You should've known better."; "should of" sounds about like "should've". Of course "should've" is a contraction for "should have" so the correct sentence is either "You should have known better." or (if speaking informally and using contractions) "You should've known better." Writing the sentence as "You should of known better." instead of "You should'veknown better." is INCORRECT.
The first example is correct. "Should have," not "should of."
I Should Have Known Better was created on 1964-07-13.
The answer is C.(3) He should never have come here.
No, more better is not correct. Better is the comparative for the adjective good; best is the superlative and should be used instead of 'more better'.
That is the correct spelling of "paracetamol" (analgesic better known as acetaminophen or Tylenol).
I Should Have Known Better - Jim Diamond song - was created on 1984-10-26.
Yes.
Have known is correct.
There is no 'correct' answer out there. However, from the point of view of health, sports are 'better.' However, remember that there is no 'correct' answer, and what you should do depends on who you are. Although you should play sports, playing computer games is no problem as long as you do regular exercise.