0
I think that lords benefited more from feudalism because of the system of promises between the lord and the vassal. The vassal would not only protect the lord, but also help the lord in daily life, such as contributing money if there was a special occasion happening with the lord.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Lords benefited more from feudalism as they owned the land and had control over the peasants who worked it. Knights, on the other hand, were lower-ranking nobles who served the lords in exchange for land and protection. This system allowed lords to accumulate wealth and power while knights served as their military force.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoWilliam the Conqueror promised to provide his lord with armed, mounted soldiers, or knights, for military duty.
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoThey got land, power, wealth, and protection.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoLords surely did benefit from feudal system, as for knights they had to prove themselves worthy to earn land and thus become lords.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is feudalism and how did it organize life in the middle ages?
Feudalism is the form of society were everything is based on land. It is usually used when there is constant conflict/wars. Society was organized (from top to bottom) kings, lords, knights, land owners, peasants/serfs.
Did knights and burgesses form the house of commons?
no its the house of lords
What is a system of rule by kings?
The system of rule by lords under a king was called feudalism. This was often a very corrupt form of government, as the lords were not really regulated by the king.
What system of rule by lords who owe loyalty to their king is called what?
The system of rule by lords under a king was called feudalism. This was often a very corrupt form of government, as the lords were not really regulated by the king.
Was William the Conqueror an important monarch?
William the Conqueror was important because he established feudalism in Europe. Europe had no central government and was constantly being attacked by vikings and other barbarians, so feudalism was very important. Feudalism was a system of loyalty. Monarchs were loyal to lords and the other way around. Lords were loyal to knights and the other way around. Knights were loyal to both lords and peasants, and lords were loyal to peasants, who were also loyal to the lords and knights. Without feudalism, no work would have gotten done, and the kingdoms may not have been protected. This is not true. Feudalism was established in France long before the Norman Conquest of England. William had to pledge loyalty to King Henry I of France as his Liege Lord under the feudal system. In later times this obligation by the descendants of William was the cause of the conflict between England and France that lasted for centuries. With the combined power of England and the Norman possessions in France the Normans saw no reason to be subservient to the French crown. William was important because he established a new order in England, he ended the conflict between the Danes and the Saxons by establishing himself as King. As a conquering leader he was able to impose his own form of centralized rule over his new kingdom. William actually spent very little time in England so he had to organise a system of government that allowed his nobility to govern without anyone getting too powerful to challenge an absentee King. His legacy was also important, as he divided his heritage between his oldest son Robert that gained Normandy and his next surviving son that became William II, establishing England as a separate kingdom again.
Was Feudalism an early form of democracy?
No there is no connection between the concept of feudalism and democracy.
How was feudalism a good form of government?
A plethora of reasons show that Feudalism was a positive influence in Europe. To illustrate, Feudalism restored trade. Before Feudalism, travel was difficult. Roads were bumpy and uneven. Often, thieves would steal many goods and sell them on the "Black Market." After Feudalism, lords oversaw the repair of trade routes, such as roads and bridges. Knights enforced the law, seizing bandits, and acting as local sheriffs. As a result, travel became easier and safer. Evidence shows that these little changes that Feudalism has brought caused trade to revive itself. Knights secured Western Europe and kept out invaders. It is clear that Feudalism encouraged trade and made people feel safer knowing that the knights were enforcing the laws. This positive attribute caused an increase in the economy and caused more people to have faith in Feudalism. Trade was vital to the success of a civilization. Trade brought items they had little of right at their fingertips. It also brought wealth to towns. During this time, a money system was not quite set up, so they bartered for items worth trading. This also brought more jobs. Trade made the middle class (merchants, farmers, artisans, crafters) wealthy. Therefore, towns were able to support a larger population with more jobs and more rare items available.Read more: Was_feudalism_successful
What kind of form of government did the Saxons have?
Feudalism.
What is feudilism?
Feudalism is a political and military system between a feudal aristocrat (a lord or liege), and his vassals. Feudalism flourished from the ninth century to the fifteenth century. In its most classic sense, feudalism refers to the Middle_AgesEuropean political system composed of a set of reciprocal legal and military obligations among the warrior nobility, revolving around the three key concepts of lords, vassals, and Fief. Although derived from the Latin word feodum (fief), then in use, the term feudalism and the system it describes were not conceived of as a formal political system by the people living in the Medieval Period.
Does knights in armor connected to form and function?
yes knights in armour are connected to form and function. Form: If the armour did not work then the knights would not of used it. Function: And the function is to protect you from a sword.
What did peasants do for lords?
Lords provided protection and meager living quarters for the peasants. But peasants were indentured servants in the middle ages (when Feudalism was pretty much the only form of government) not because they owed debt, but simply because they were born into it. They could never work their way up the social ladder, and the only protection the lords provided was to let all the peasants into the walls of their manor house during raids, not exactly a win-win.
When was the date that feudalism started?
In Europe, feudalism was most prominent between A.D. 800 and A.D. 1400. However, feudalism has existed in some shape or form since the Sumerians.
