There are 2 major statements regarding the laws of reflection:-
1. The angle of incidence = angle of reflection OR theta 1 = theta 2
and
2. The incident ray, the reflected ray and the normal (line perpendicular to the plane of the mirror/ reflective surface) all lie in the same plane.
Hope this helps.
If more information is required, you can email physicsisland@hotmail.com
Laws of reflection
An example of the law of reflection
Main article: Specular reflection
If the reflecting surface is very smooth, the reflection of light that occurs is called specular or regular reflection. The laws of reflection are as follows:
The incident ray, the reflected ray and the normal to the reflection surface at the point of the incidence lie in the same plane.
The angle which the incident ray makes with the normal is equal to the angle which the reflected ray makes to the same normal.
The reflected ray and the incident ray are on the opposite sides of the normal.
Refraction is the change in direction of a wave due to a change in its medium. It is essentially a surface phenomenon. The phenomenon is mainly in governance to the law of conservation of energy and momentum. Due to change of medium, the phase velocity of the wave is changed but its frequency remains constant. This is most commonly observed when a wave passes from one medium to another at any angle other than 90° or 0°. Refraction of light is the most commonly observed phenomenon, but any type of wave can refract when it interacts with a medium, for example when sound waves pass from one medium into another or when water waves move into water of a different depth. Refraction is described by Snell's law, which states that for a given pair of media and a wave with a single frequency, the ratio of the sines of the angle of incidence θ1 and angle of refraction θ2 is equivalent to the ratio of phase velocities (v1 / v2) in the two media, or equivalently, to the opposite ratio of the indices of refraction (n2 / n1):
Actually there are two laws.
First one is not usually understood by many of us.
Second one is very easy to understand. That states that the angle of incidence and angle of reflection are equal.
In the first law, we get the statement as
" the incident ray, the reflected ray and the normal drawn to the reflecting surface all the three lie in the same plane"
This could be realized only by those who are able to imagine the three dimensional view
To prove the law of reflection, you'll need a ray of light, maybe from a flashlight, some white paper, and a mirror. First, you'd lay some white paper on a table, so you'll see the flashlight's beam of light being relected. If someone can hold a mirror facing upside-down about 3 feet above the table while you're pointing the turned-on flashlight upward at the mirror at any angle, you should be able to see the light bouncing from the mirror at the same angle by looking at the white paper, but on the other side of the mirror. See the related link for more details.
laws of reflection are:
1.the incident ray the reflected ray &the normal to the surface at the point of contact are all in the same plane.
2.angle of incidence is equal to angle of reflection
Angle of incidence is always equal to the angle of reflection
The incident ray , the normal at the point of incidence and the reflected ray all lie in the same plane.
The function and use of a dynamic cart is to provide sample tools in physics. Dynamic carts are used to demonstrate the laws of dynamics.
Reflection
A model is an explanation of why an event occurs, and how data and events are related. So theories and hypothesis are testable statements and broad generalizations to compare data and to collect data.
A scientific hypothesis is not accepted if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong. In fact, if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong, then it is unfalsifiable and unscientific. For example, if I hypothesize that an all-powerful being created the Universe, there is no way to demonstrate that this hypothesis is wrong. One might argue that none of the natural laws of science require the intervention of an all-powerful being, but then I would simply argue that is because the being designed things that way. Because I can come up with any unfalsifiable explanation for any objection not only is there no way to demonstrate that my hypothesis is wrong, there is also no scientific reason or evidence to believe it is right.
Diffuse reflection
you can demonstrate total internal reflection using a light source and glass gratings.
When the rays of light do not follow the laws of reflection, then this type of reflection is called diffused reflection.
Reflection.
the laws of reflection hold for irregular reflection because every angle of incidence and reflection have their own normals.therefore the angle of reflection become equal to the reflected ray and thus the law of reflection hold.if they have their own normal they must be in one plane.
yes man of course
angle of incidence is equal to angle of reflection.
Descartes explains the logic behind the laws of reflection he discovered in his work "Dioptrics". He uses the idea of a tennis ball bouncing at an angle of the ground and up through a sheet to formulate the laws of reflection on a geometric plane.
there are two laws of reflection 1 angle of incidence is always equal to the angle of reflection 2 incident ray,reflected ray and the normal at the point of incidence lie in the same plane.
The angle of incidence is ALWAYS equal to the angle of reflection! This is one of the laws of reflection.
1.Regular Reflection takes place only on a smooth and higly polished surface.Eg. Mirror 2.Regular reflection has application of laws of reflections. 1. Irregular(diffuse) reflection takes place on irregular surfaces , with high no. of grooves. Eg. walls 2. Laws of reflection do not apply in irregular relfection.
attract
Neil Armstrong