At the beginning of the US Civil War, President Lincoln appointed generals for political reasons, not based on military experience.
As the US Civil War unfolded, the US army was small and did not have many generals. In order to command all the Union recruits, new generals had to be appointed. In 1861, Lincoln appointed one hundred and twenty six generals.
152, a few too many to name.
There are 40 Generals Currently on Active Duty. This does not count the Generals that are in the National Guard and Reserve who have been activated or otherwise. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_duty_United_States_four-star_officers
The number of generals appointed by the assembly in ancient Greece varied depending on the city-state and the time period. In Athens, for example, there were typically ten generals elected each year. Other city-states may have had different numbers of generals, depending on their military needs and political structure.
I can give a partial answer. The Union Army in the East had the following Commanding Generals- Winfield Scott,Irwin McDowell,George McClellan,John Pope,George McClellan(again),Ambrose Burnside,Joseph Hooker,George Meade,and Ulysses Grant. Of the several other Union Armies in the West I am ignorant as to their Commanding Generals.
As the US Civil War unfolded, the US army was small and did not have many generals. In order to command all the Union recruits, new generals had to be appointed. In 1861, Lincoln appointed one hundred and twenty six generals.
One key advantage the North lacked was the number of generals who could serve a "general in chief " of the entire Union military. Lincoln had to appoint, then relieve far too many generals whom he appointed to take on that responsibility with success. Finally, Lincoln appointed General Grant to handle that assignment and Grant succeeded where the former generals failed.
One key advantage the North lacked was the number of generals who could serve a "general in chief " of the entire Union military. Lincoln had to appoint, then relieve far too many generals whom he appointed to take on that responsibility with success. Finally, Lincoln appointed General Grant to handle that assignment and Grant succeeded where the former generals failed.
Too many to list
152, a few too many to name.
9001.
Ten generals - one from each tribe - were appointed to lead the army. They were often given directions by the Assembly to to implement decisions by the Assembly, as they were appointed on merit, rather than randomly by lot as were the 500 council members.
There were so many Union generals replaced because none of them did a good enough job to remain in the position, many of the North's good generals like Robert E. Lee resigned from the Union army to go fight for their home state in the Confederacy
There are 40 Generals Currently on Active Duty. This does not count the Generals that are in the National Guard and Reserve who have been activated or otherwise. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_duty_United_States_four-star_officers
Well, there were many diffrent Generals during the Civil War. But, if you mean the Leaders Lincoln for Union and Lee for Confederacy. If im not right feel free to correct me!
20
The number of generals appointed by the assembly in ancient Greece varied depending on the city-state and the time period. In Athens, for example, there were typically ten generals elected each year. Other city-states may have had different numbers of generals, depending on their military needs and political structure.