Remind him that it's a dumb idea, from a father's right advocate. Why is he behind, and is he moving to find work? You can't stop him moving unless he's $5000 behind. If he's in arrears due to a job loss, help him get the amount modified. see link
If done with the limitations set by the court, yes. In Kansas, in order to challenge an adoption, the father must have begun paying child support four months prior to the birth.
Paternity must be established before support is ordered. Doing so requires actual notice to the putative father, not publication or ordinary mail. The father's name may be entered on a birth certificate only if he signs an acknowledgment of paternity. Retroactive support is generally limited to 24 months prior to the effective date of current support. Default judgments and imputed income occur only when the PF has failed to respond to such notice. The 65% rule kicks in only if one has several children.
The father must pay until the child is out of high school, not just until he is 18. As long as the court has the address, the payments would continue. Her moving does not make a difference.
confusing
If photos were taken eight months prior to the tenant moving in and the landlord is using this as evidence of that tenant's damages then he is NOT committing an offense of Contempt of Court: he is committing the offense of PERJURY, or lying to court and creating false evidence, which is even more serious.
In theory, yes. However, the court will not likely order support prior to the time that the father knew about the child. The court should also take into consideration any voluntary support the father gave.
You should be able to persuade the court to terminate support (but you would still owe any unpaid support that accrued prior to that termination.
Yes, until the order is overturned, and provided the mother is not on Welfare.
If he can prove through a paternity test that he is not the father, he needs to petition the court to stop child support and can ask that prior child support be returned to him.
No. At the maximum, in Michigan, you have to file prior to age 23. But, don't assume he didn't. see link
This assumes that you're asking about retroactive support (support due for a period prior to the entry of the first order), not unpaid support that accrued as the result of an order). Retroactive support is typically included in the first order entered in the case.
Yes his father was Prior to his son